2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

38
343
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(385 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
38
343
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To distinguish possible positive selection from relaxed constraint, we tested explicitly for genes that have a subset of codons with signatures of positive selection, using codon-based likelihood models of molecular evolution, implemented in PAML 78,79 (Supplementary Information section 11.1). Although this test is typically regarded as a conservative test for positive selection, it may be confounded by selection at synonymous sites.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To distinguish possible positive selection from relaxed constraint, we tested explicitly for genes that have a subset of codons with signatures of positive selection, using codon-based likelihood models of molecular evolution, implemented in PAML 78,79 (Supplementary Information section 11.1). Although this test is typically regarded as a conservative test for positive selection, it may be confounded by selection at synonymous sites.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analyses have suggested that although the level of gene expression consistently seems to be a major determinant of variation in rates of evolution among proteins 86,87 , other factors probably play a significant, if perhaps minor, part [88][89][90][91] . In Drosophila, although highly expressed genes do evolve more slowly, breadth of expression across tissues, gene essentiality and intron number all also independently correlate with rates of protein evolution, suggesting that the additional complexities of multicellular organisms are important factors in modulating rates of protein evolution 78 . The presence of repetitive amino acid sequences has a role as well: nonrepeat regions in proteins containing repeats evolve faster and show more evidence for positive selection than genes lacking repeats 92 .…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombination is a major determinant in genome evolution (Gaut et al, 2007;Larracuente et al, 2008). Regions that lack recombination tend to lose functional genes and accumulate junk DNA because the evolutionary fates of mutations in non-recombining regions are not independent and natural selection cannot effectively eliminate deleterious and fix advantageous mutations (Hill and Robertson, 1966;Felsenstein, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gene dispensability, number of interacting proteins, and local recombination rate, influence the rate of molecular evolution (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Among them, gene expression level and ubiquity (or specificity) are of particular interest, because both are general characters and easily measurable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%