2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/771/1/28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Progenitors for Electron Capture Supernovae

Abstract: We provide progenitor models for electron capture supernovae (ECSNe) with detailed evolutionary calculation. We include minor electron capture nuclei using a large nuclear reaction network with updated reaction rates. For electron capture, the Coulomb correction of rates is treated and the contribution from neutron-rich isotopes is taken into account in each nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE) composition. We calculate the evolution of the most massive super asymptotic giant branch stars and show that these … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
146
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For stars which do not ignite oxygen, but for which their ONeMg cores are more massive than 1.37 M⊙, the final fate is an EC SN (Nomoto 1987;Podsiadlowski et al 2004;Takahashi et al 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Evolution Leading To An Electron-capture Snmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stars which do not ignite oxygen, but for which their ONeMg cores are more massive than 1.37 M⊙, the final fate is an EC SN (Nomoto 1987;Podsiadlowski et al 2004;Takahashi et al 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Evolution Leading To An Electron-capture Snmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tauris et al (2015) adopted M ONe,f = 1.43M⊙ as an approximate upper limit for electron-capture SN. In the case of single star evolution in Takahashi et al (2013), a 10.8 M⊙ model ends its evolution as an electron-capture SN and an 11.0 M⊙ model ignites Ne at an off-center region. Off-center Ne ignition and gradual increase in the central temperature around the central density ρC ∼ 10 9 g cm −3 could be predictions of the Fe core formation and core-collapse SN.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make initial conditions for hydrodynamics simulations, we first perform stellar evolutionary simulations of CO cores with masses of 1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 M⊙ supposing that stellar mass loss has already occurred by their hypothetical companion NSs. By removing stellar envelope, the stellar evolutionary simulations are done with a code described in Umeda et al (2012); Takahashi et al (2013); Yoshida et al (2014). The nuclear reaction network consists of 300 species of nuclei (Takahashi et al 2013;Yoshida et al 2014).…”
Section: Stellar Evolution and Progenitor Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we used a mixing length parameter of 2 with a semiconvection efficiency parameter of 1. As the core mass is rather small, weak reactions play an important role in the evolution of the core approaching collapse (e.g., Takahashi, Yoshida, & Umeda 2013;Jones et al 2013;Schwab, Quataert, & Bildsten 2015). Therefore we used the large nuclear network ''mesa151.net'' provided in MESA, which includes 151 nuclei up to 65 Ni with important weak reactions such as electron capture by 33 S and 35 Cl.…”
Section: Progenitormentioning
confidence: 99%