2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of population structure in an estuarine‐dependent marine fish

Abstract: Restriction site‐associated DNA (RAD) sequencing was used to characterize neutral and adaptive genetic variation among geographic samples of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, an estuarine‐dependent fish found in coastal waters along the southeastern coast of the United States (Atlantic) and the northern Gulf of Mexico (Gulf). Analyses of neutral and outlier loci revealed three genetically distinct regional clusters: one in the Atlantic and two in the northern Gulf. Divergence in neutral loci indicated gradual gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(95 reference statements)
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Hollenbeck et al. ; Anderson et al. ), a finding that underscores the risk of overinterpreting smaller genetic data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Hollenbeck et al. ; Anderson et al. ), a finding that underscores the risk of overinterpreting smaller genetic data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New genomic-based methods (e.g., Peterson et al 2012) allow for simultaneous locus discovery and genotyping of potentially thousands of genetic markers for a reduced per-sample cost. These "genomic" methods have frequently demonstrated a pattern whereby small numbers of loci (presumably under directional selection) show elevated divergence relative to the genomic mean in marine fishes (Portnoy et al 2015;Hollenbeck et al 2018;Anderson et al 2019), a finding that underscores the risk of overinterpreting smaller genetic data sets. Nevertheless, in the absence of such genomic data, the present data suggest a tentative single-stock management unit for each of the predominant snook species in Texas.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our isolation by distance (IBD) results also suggested that the genetic structure demonstrates the effect of dispersion and selection for the outlier dataset, and these factors should be considered when delineating conservation and management units [50]. The outlier loci suggest adaptive responses to potential environmental factors, such as salinity, which vary on regional scales, while neutral loci are influenced by genetic drift [52]. Given that the divergences revealed by the outlier dataset are discordant with the neutral loci, these loci should be driven by the effects of selection and not by the isolation alone [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Genetic differentiation, under selective force, is not unprecedented, given that analysis based on markers under selection provides more structuring, compared to neutral markers [29,51]. This type of analysis is more promising for populations with a large effective size and minimal genetic drift effect [52], where a high level of gene flow may not be efficient to dilute the differentiation effects driven by adaptive markers [30]. The higher level of assignment success of NextRAD sequencing is likely due to larger number of loci and also outlier loci with a high discriminatory power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although similar genetic discriminations were observed, putatively adaptive SNP loci most powerfully detected the genetic discrimination, as revealed by demographic interpretations and inferred clustering analyses. Compared to conventional molecular markers used for population genetic studies, our SkimSeq approach uses unbiased whole genome sequences to accurately identify the traces of selection that cause genetic differentiation using a lower coverage area with combination of small population size [ 77 , 78 ]. We noted that the impact of random genetic drift is larger in smaller sample size [ 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%