2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of planetary systems in resonance

Abstract: Abstract.We study the time evolution of two protoplanets still embedded in a protoplanetary disk. The results of two different numerical approaches are presented and compared. In the first approach, the motion of the disk material is computed with viscous hydrodynamical simulations, and the planetary motion is determined by N-body calculations including exactly the gravitational forces exerted by the disk material. In the second approach, only the N-body integration is performed but with additional dissipative… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
194
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
194
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inner planet is located at x = −0.11, y = −0.61 and the outer one at x = −0.48, y = −1.37. In contrast to previous models where the two planets orbit in an inner cavity of the disk without any inner disk (Kley et al 2004), here the inner disk has not been cleared and is still present due to the more realistic inner boundary condition given in Eq. (1).…”
Section: A Hydrodynamical Model For Hd 73526mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inner planet is located at x = −0.11, y = −0.61 and the outer one at x = −0.48, y = −1.37. In contrast to previous models where the two planets orbit in an inner cavity of the disk without any inner disk (Kley et al 2004), here the inner disk has not been cleared and is still present due to the more realistic inner boundary condition given in Eq. (1).…”
Section: A Hydrodynamical Model For Hd 73526mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to full hydrodynamical simulations a cavity opens between the giant planets, and the inner planet orbits in a low density gaseous environment. The outer giant planet is still connected to the disk, thus it can accrete more material, which may result in larger mass for it than for the inner planet (Kley et al 2004). …”
Section: New Orbital Data and Their Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed inner and outer planet masses are such that, if (as is commonly assumed for multiplanetary systems of this kind) the planets are initially separated widely enough that their period ratio exceeds 2, a 2:1 commensurability is expected to form at low migration rates (e.g. Nelson & Papaloizou 2002;Kley et al 2004). Pierens & Nelson (2008) have studied a similar scenario where the goal was to resemble the 3:2 resonance between Jupiter and Saturn in the early solar system.…”
Section: Convergent Migration and Resonance Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous theoretical studies have been carried out since the discovery of the second planet to determine what physical processes gave rise to the system's unique architecture (e.g. Lee & Peale 2002;Ji et al 2002;Kley et al 2004Kley et al , 2005Zhou et al 2005;Crida et al 2008) because such specific consideration has the potential for constraining general theories of planet formation and evolution. Determining what mechanisms could have led to the current system arrangement depends critically on knowing the masses of the planets involved, and what the current arrangement itself even is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%