2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(13)60111-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of overmature marine shale porosity and implication to the free gas volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This portion of gas would be important to the preservation of shale porosity in the very high maturity stage. Porosity data from the North America shale and the Lower Paleozoic shale of the southern area of the Sichuan Basin show an obvious decrease when R o or EqR o is over 3.0 % (Wang et al 2013a), implying that this relationship indeed exists in natural shale systems. Figure 3 further shows that shale porosity varies widely from 3 % to 6 % when R o or EqR o value is between 1.0 % and 3.0 %, without a clear relationship with maturity, which reflects the combined effect of multiple factors (except for maturity), such as TOC content and mineral compositions on shale porosity (Curtis et al 2010;Chalmers and Bustin 2008;Chalmers et al 2012;Ross and Bustin 2009).…”
Section: Geological Characteristics Of the Lower Paleozoic Shalementioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This portion of gas would be important to the preservation of shale porosity in the very high maturity stage. Porosity data from the North America shale and the Lower Paleozoic shale of the southern area of the Sichuan Basin show an obvious decrease when R o or EqR o is over 3.0 % (Wang et al 2013a), implying that this relationship indeed exists in natural shale systems. Figure 3 further shows that shale porosity varies widely from 3 % to 6 % when R o or EqR o value is between 1.0 % and 3.0 %, without a clear relationship with maturity, which reflects the combined effect of multiple factors (except for maturity), such as TOC content and mineral compositions on shale porosity (Curtis et al 2010;Chalmers and Bustin 2008;Chalmers et al 2012;Ross and Bustin 2009).…”
Section: Geological Characteristics Of the Lower Paleozoic Shalementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Lower Cambrian and Lower Silurian shales have EqR o values of, respectively, 2.7 %-6.2 % and 1.9 %-3.8 % in the whole Yangtze region (Cheng and Xiao 2013), and 2.5 %-3.5 % and 2.4 %-3.2 % in the Sichuan Basin (Wang et al 2009a;Zou et al 2014). Shale generally has a quite low porosity when it has evolved to the dry gas stage (R o [ 2.0 %) (Wang et al 2013a), but its reservoir properties still change with further increasing maturity (Chen and Xiao 2014). Substantial uplifting and strata denudation reduce the temperature and pressure of a shale system, which will lead to an increase in its fluid pressure coefficient if the system is ideally confined (Zhou et al 2014b).…”
Section: Geological Characteristics Of the Lower Paleozoic Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations