2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Ohmically Heated Hot Jupiters

Abstract: We present calculations of thermal evolution of Hot Jupiters with various masses and effective temperatures under Ohmic dissipation. The resulting evolutionary sequences show a clear tendency towards inflated radii for effective temperatures that give rise to significant ionization of alkali metals in the atmosphere, compatible with the trend of the data. The degree of inflation shows that Ohmic dissipation, along with the likely variability in heavy element content can account for all of the currently detecte… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
239
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
18
239
10
Order By: Relevance
“…10) and hence requires an additional source of heat to explain its size, in line with what is inferred from a significant fraction of close-in transiting giant planets (e.g. Guillot et al 2006;Laughlin et al 2011;Batygin et al 2011 Fig. 8.…”
Section: Planetary System Evolution Modelssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…10) and hence requires an additional source of heat to explain its size, in line with what is inferred from a significant fraction of close-in transiting giant planets (e.g. Guillot et al 2006;Laughlin et al 2011;Batygin et al 2011 Fig. 8.…”
Section: Planetary System Evolution Modelssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, we do not know precisely how much the planet could actually dissipate in its interior (e.g. Guillot & Showman 2002;Batygin et al 2011;Laughlin et al 2011): reducing by 2 (respectively 5 and 10) the amount of energy dissipated in the planet's interior, moves the 0 M ⊕ line from 1.444 to 1.391 R Jup (respectively 1.332 and 1.294, Fig. 8), which corresponds to a 3.7% reduction in radius (respectively 7.7% and 10%).…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the unusually large radius (compared to its sub-Saturn mass) cannot be explained by the standard coreless model (e.g., Fortney et al 2007), and places it in the short-period Neptune desert, a region between Jovian and super-Earth planets with a lack of detected planets (Howard et al 2012;Mazeh et al 2016). Several inflation mechanisms have been proposed to explain this inflation, including tidal heating, enhanced atmospheric opacity, Ohmic heating, and/or reinflation by the host star when moving toward the red giant branch phase (Leconte et al 2010;Batygin & Stevenson 2010;Batygin et al 2011;Lammer et al 2013;Rauscher & Menou 2013;Spiegel & Burrows 2013;Wu & Lithwick 2013;Lopez & Fortney 2016), although no concluding observations have been established yet to favor one or the other. The formation and evolution mechanisms of WASP-127b are therfore very intriguing, given its transition size between these two classes of planets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%