2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00893.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of novel jaw joints promote trophic diversity in coral reef fishes

Abstract: We investigated the functional morphology and ecology of biting among the squamipinnes, an assemblage of nine successful and distinctive reef fish families. We demonstrate that an intramandibular joint (IMJ) may have evolved at least three and possibly five times in this assemblage and discuss the impact of this recurring innovation in facilitating prey-capture by biting. Using character mapping on a supertree for the squamipinnes, we reveal up to seven gains or losses of intramandibular flexion, all associate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, however, that the orientation of the hinge axes of the ceratohyal and dentary symphysis differ considerably in H. reidi (Fig.2). Although articulations between dentaries and anguloarticulars (Aerts et al, 1987;Vial and Ojeda, 1992;Konow et al, 2008;Ferry-Graham and Konow, 2010), and between the anterior and posterior ceratohyals of a single side (Diogo, 2005; are relatively common in actinopterygian fishes, the model assumes that mobility in these connections is negligible in H. reidi. The posterior ceratohyal bone tapers ventrally where there is a strongly interdigitated, firm synchondrosis with the anterior ceratohyal bone (Leysen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Bony Elements And Joint Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, however, that the orientation of the hinge axes of the ceratohyal and dentary symphysis differ considerably in H. reidi (Fig.2). Although articulations between dentaries and anguloarticulars (Aerts et al, 1987;Vial and Ojeda, 1992;Konow et al, 2008;Ferry-Graham and Konow, 2010), and between the anterior and posterior ceratohyals of a single side (Diogo, 2005; are relatively common in actinopterygian fishes, the model assumes that mobility in these connections is negligible in H. reidi. The posterior ceratohyal bone tapers ventrally where there is a strongly interdigitated, firm synchondrosis with the anterior ceratohyal bone (Leysen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Bony Elements And Joint Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These refined groupings are based on studies considering both behaviour (e.g., microhabitat utilization of biting) and morphology, especially jaw-shape, dentition, jaw articulation, and musculature (Bellwood and Choat 1990;Ceccarelli et al 2005;Konow et al 2008;Bellwood et al 2014). While all of these grazing fishes may facilitate the removal of algae from turfs, they have different dietary targets and means of ingestion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different definitions of key innovations have been proposed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], all of them share the basic idea that some attributes of the organism have been important over evolutionary time [8] and that the key innovation allows the utilization of resources in ways not previously possible [9,10]. The pharyngeal jaw in cichlids [11], the intramandibular joint in squamipinnes such as pomacanthids and acanthurids [12][13][14][15][16], the "beak-like" jaws in parrotfishes [17], the toepads of geckos [10,18], the presence of molars with a hypocone in mammals [19] are all classic examples of key innovations in vertebrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%