2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.152445399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes

Abstract: Mate finding in most moth species involves long-distance signaling via female-emitted sex pheromones. There is a great diversity of pheromone structures used throughout the Lepidoptera, even among closely related species. The conundrum is how signal divergence has occurred. With strong normalizing selection pressure on blend composition and response preferences, it is improbable that shifts to pheromones of diverse structures occur through adaptive changes in small steps. Here, we present data supporting the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
386
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
386
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, divergence in olfactory signals results from the inactivation of a desaturase enzyme. Research on the desaturases in various moth species revealed that another way to produce a change in pheromone blend is by activation of a non-functional desaturase gene transcript present in the pheromone gland (Roelofs and Rooney, 2003): for instance, pheromonal differences between O. nubilalis and its Asian relative Ostrinia furnacalis result from the activation of an ancestral desaturase gene in O. furnacalis, found to be inactivated in all other Ostrinia species (Roelofs et al, 2002). From these examples on destaturases, it is clear that the change occurred in a single step whereas large differences that map to a single locus, but have not been characterized at the molecular level, could, in principle, have accumulated by a series of substitutions of small effect.…”
Section: Genetics Of Divergence In Chemical Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, divergence in olfactory signals results from the inactivation of a desaturase enzyme. Research on the desaturases in various moth species revealed that another way to produce a change in pheromone blend is by activation of a non-functional desaturase gene transcript present in the pheromone gland (Roelofs and Rooney, 2003): for instance, pheromonal differences between O. nubilalis and its Asian relative Ostrinia furnacalis result from the activation of an ancestral desaturase gene in O. furnacalis, found to be inactivated in all other Ostrinia species (Roelofs et al, 2002). From these examples on destaturases, it is clear that the change occurred in a single step whereas large differences that map to a single locus, but have not been characterized at the molecular level, could, in principle, have accumulated by a series of substitutions of small effect.…”
Section: Genetics Of Divergence In Chemical Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second cluster of four genes fell between MtnA and slo; one or more of these elongases is likely to be important in the difference between D. simulans and D. sechellia. Most of the literature discussing genetic control of pheromonal differences among species has focused on the role of desaturases (e.g., Coyne et al, 1999;Rosenfield et al, 2001;Fang et al, 2002;Roelofs et al, 2002;Greenberg et al, 2003;Roelofs and Rooney, 2003;Coyne and Elwyn, 2006;Legendre et al, 2008). Although a desaturase has been implicated for 3L, there is at least an equal role in CHC for elongases in the difference between D. simulans and D. sechellia.…”
Section: Qtl Candidate Genes and Qtl Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the expression of a single desaturase in the Asian Corn Borer results in a novel pheromonal blend compared with the European Corn Borer (Roelofs et al, 2002), and there is evidence for a single gene change in sibling species of Helicoverpa moths resulting in a pheromonal blend change (Wang et al, 2008). Although in both of these cases single genes are implicated, the allelic difference between species results in a change in the blend of compounds, not just a single pheromone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This early classical view had arisen because receivers often seem to be highly sensitive and narrowly tuned to the conspecific pheromone blend, and a slight change in the blend would thus result in a fitness loss of the signaller and therefore selected against (e.g. [18,19]). Nevertheless, various studies found considerable interindividual variation in the amount and ratio of pheromone components [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%