2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of magnetism in Hf–Fe metallic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that in our sample, some MNPs are non-or weakly interacting (Peak 1), and others have a strong interaction, showing a super-spin-glass behaviour (Peak 2). This possibility is also supported by a similar behaviour observed in the literature [39][40][41] and could be better investigated in the future by studying the third harmonic signal of the sample [40,42]. All the results obtained by the fit proposed in Figure 5 are valid in non-zero DC fields.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is possible that in our sample, some MNPs are non-or weakly interacting (Peak 1), and others have a strong interaction, showing a super-spin-glass behaviour (Peak 2). This possibility is also supported by a similar behaviour observed in the literature [39][40][41] and could be better investigated in the future by studying the third harmonic signal of the sample [40,42]. All the results obtained by the fit proposed in Figure 5 are valid in non-zero DC fields.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The magnetic susceptibility of the Cantor alloy in Figure 15 has a similar value to that of the Hf 1-x Fe x MGs [ 113 ] with x around 0.4, which correspond to a superparamagnetic state. Although the M–H curve for the alloy with x = 0.3 is qualitatively similar to that of the Cantor alloy ( Figure 15 ), it shows a somewhat more complex magnetic behavior at low temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the Fe–Hf system, alloying is found to reduce the magnetic moment of Fe, and for Hf concentration above 50 at%, the system becomes nonmagnetic. [ 49 ] In the absence of proximity‐induced magnetization in Hf layers, the maximum thickness of the magnetic dead layer can be D md = d = 0.45 nm, which correspond to m i = 0. However, the total thickness of the magnetic dead layer at both the interfaces together, as obtained from MOKE measurements, is 0.8 nm.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%