2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of long-lived globular cluster stars

Abstract: Context. Our understanding of the formation and early evolution of globular clusters (GCs) has been totally overthrown with the discovery of the peculiar chemical properties of their long-lived host stars. Aims. As a consequence, the interpretation of the observed color-magnitude diagrams and of the properties of the GC stellar populations requires the use of stellar models computed with relevant chemical compositions.Methods. We present a grid of 224 stellar evolution models for low-mass stars with initial ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication of initial helium enhancement on the HB morphology has been extensively discussed in the literature (e.g. D 'Antona et al 2010;Chantereau et al 2015, and references therein). Helium variations are also invoked to explain (at least partly) the peculiar photometric patterns (multiple sequences and/or spreads at the turnoff and/or along the subgiant and giant branches) in the colour−magnitude diagram (CMD) of several GCs Marino et al 2012;Piotto et al 2012;Monelli et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implication of initial helium enhancement on the HB morphology has been extensively discussed in the literature (e.g. D 'Antona et al 2010;Chantereau et al 2015, and references therein). Helium variations are also invoked to explain (at least partly) the peculiar photometric patterns (multiple sequences and/or spreads at the turnoff and/or along the subgiant and giant branches) in the colour−magnitude diagram (CMD) of several GCs Marino et al 2012;Piotto et al 2012;Monelli et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sequences are provided for two progenitor metallicities Z=0.001 and Z=0.0005. To date, no such exploration of the evolution of He-rich stars exists in the literature, the only exception is that of Chantereau et al (2015), who presented evolutionary sequences for He-rich progenitors for low-mass stars (up to 1 M ⊙ ) with Z=0.0005 from the ZAMS to the end of the AGB phase, but did not compute the white dwarf stage. We emphasize that the comptutation of the entire evolutionary history of progenitor stars allows us to have self-consistent white dwarf initial models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the FRMS scenario predicts that 2P stars can start their life with an helium mass fraction of between that of 1P stars (i.e., typically 0.248 for the metallicity presented in this study) and 0.8, the maximum helium enrichment provided by the AGB scenario amounts to at most ∼0.36−0.38 in mass fraction (e.g., Siess 2010;Doherty et al 2014). Since the initial helium content is an important ingredient for the evolution of stars (e.g., Iben & Rood 1969;Demarque et al 1971;Sweigart 1978;Maeder 2009;Chantereau et al 2015), it is mandatory to quantify the effect of these differences on the expected properties of GC multiple populations (e.g., D'Antona et al 2002;Salaris et al 2006;Pietrinferni et al 2009;Sbordone et al 2011;Valcarce et al 2012;Cassisi et al 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact processes governing the formation of multiple populations in GCs are far from being understood and are strongly debated (e.g., Bastian & Lardo 2015;Renzini et al 2015;Krause et al 2016). Competing scenarios invoke different types of possible 1P polluters, namely asymptotic giant branch stars (AGB; Ventura et al 2001;D'Ercole et al 2010;Ventura & D'Antona 2011;Ventura et al 2013), fast-rotating massive stars (FRMS; Prantzos & Charbonnel 2006;Decressin et al 2007a,b;Krause et al 2013;Chantereau et al 2015), massive binary stars (de Mink et al 2009), supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014), or a combination of some of the above-mentioned polluters (Sills & Glebbeek 2010;Bastian et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation