Proceedings of the First International Seminar on the Reduction of Risk in the Management of Tailings and Mine Waste 2010
DOI: 10.36487/acg_rep/1008_08_howard
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of landform design concepts

Abstract: Over the last 10 years, Landloch Pty Ltd has developed and applied a distinctive approach to the design of final waste dump shapes and the management of their rehabilitation. Various elements of that approach have been recommended and/or adopted by both industry and regulators to greater or lesser degrees, and with varying levels of both commitment and success. This paper briefly outlines the approach applied, and discusses its limitations and successes, using examples from a number of mine sites. It then cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, not all concave shapes are mechanically stable, requiring a rational definition of those concave slopes that provide the desired degree of stability expressed in terms of a desired factor of safety (FS). For example, Howard et al (2011) point out the risk associated with the growing practice of shaping slopes to reflect natural regional landforms without appropriate stability and erosion analyses and without accounting for the limited precision of the construction equipment employed to build concave profiles. Hence, the objectives of this work are to (1) describe concave shapes that provide a desired degree of stability (a desired FS) for given soil properties, (2) provide a quantitative measure of the difference in soil loss (erosion) between concave and planar slopes that satisfy the same degree of mechanical stability, and (3) investigate the precision to which concave forms can be constructed and how this affects the desired slope stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, not all concave shapes are mechanically stable, requiring a rational definition of those concave slopes that provide the desired degree of stability expressed in terms of a desired factor of safety (FS). For example, Howard et al (2011) point out the risk associated with the growing practice of shaping slopes to reflect natural regional landforms without appropriate stability and erosion analyses and without accounting for the limited precision of the construction equipment employed to build concave profiles. Hence, the objectives of this work are to (1) describe concave shapes that provide a desired degree of stability (a desired FS) for given soil properties, (2) provide a quantitative measure of the difference in soil loss (erosion) between concave and planar slopes that satisfy the same degree of mechanical stability, and (3) investigate the precision to which concave forms can be constructed and how this affects the desired slope stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, there are clear requirements and guidelines to construct post-mining landforms that are safe, stable and non-polluting for humans, flora and fauna, and capable of sustaining land use after mining finishes. Howard et al (2011) make a synthesis for different Australian states, referring to laws for Western Australia and Queensland and guidelines in such a direction in New South Wales. In Canada, mining legislation requests the reconstruction of 'self-sustained' landforms and ecosystems that are compatible with a healthy environment and the maintenance of other human activities.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Stabilisation In Mine Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, a process-based model such as WEPP operates on a daily time step, provides erosion predictions on an event basis (rather than annual rates only), predicts erosion changes along a slope length, and can account for erosion in rills. Howard et al (2013) provides a comparison of the RUSLE and WEPP models and how they can be used in mine site closure designs. The WEPP model was used to predict runoff and erosion based on the calibrated erodibility parameters derived from the field tests.…”
Section: Initial Erosion Modelling and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%