2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.66711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of irreversible somatic differentiation

Abstract: A key innovation emerging in complex animals is irreversible somatic differentiation: daughters of a vegetative cell perform a vegetative function as well, thus, forming a somatic lineage that can no longer be directly involved in reproduction. Primitive species use a different strategy: vegetative and reproductive tasks are separated in time rather than in space. Starting from such a strategy, how is it possible to evolve life forms which use some of their cells exclusively for vegetative functions? Here, we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colonies are born small, but due to cell divisions they increase in size and, eventually, fragment, so the number of colonies in the population increases. The life cycle maximizing the population growth rate has a selective advantage as it outgrows all competitors ( Roze and Michod, 2001 ; Libby et al, 2014 ; Pichugin et al, 2017 ; Pichugin et al, 2019 ; Staps et al, 2019 ; Gao et al, 2019 ; Pichugin and Traulsen, 2020 ; Gao et al, 2021 ; Pichugin, 2022 ; Pichugin and Traulsen, 2022 ). For groups made of identical cells, growth competition models of evolution predict that some life cycles cannot be the winners of this growth competition under any conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colonies are born small, but due to cell divisions they increase in size and, eventually, fragment, so the number of colonies in the population increases. The life cycle maximizing the population growth rate has a selective advantage as it outgrows all competitors ( Roze and Michod, 2001 ; Libby et al, 2014 ; Pichugin et al, 2017 ; Pichugin et al, 2019 ; Staps et al, 2019 ; Gao et al, 2019 ; Pichugin and Traulsen, 2020 ; Gao et al, 2021 ; Pichugin, 2022 ; Pichugin and Traulsen, 2022 ). For groups made of identical cells, growth competition models of evolution predict that some life cycles cannot be the winners of this growth competition under any conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, V. Rossetti et al assume a fragmenting filamentous life cycle similar to ours and explore when division of labor may evolve [ 52 , 56 , 76 ]. Other studies have considered the evolution of reproductive division of labor [ 62 , 77 , 78 ], terminal cell differentiation [ 79 ], and programmed cell death [ 57 ]; but importantly these works do not adopt a comparative approach to investigate what other multicellular life cycles may evolve these traits. Studies of multicellular adaptation that do compare different multicellular life cycles often impose some selective environment and determine which life cycle is fittest under these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model assumption corresponds to studies concerning size effect on growth [ 29 34 ]. The size perturbations used in our work allow a wide range of size functional forms to be investigated, including those studied in previous work [ 11 , 12 , 47 ]. If the size function is arbitrary (randomly choose each χ n ), we found the frequently observed optimal reproductive strategy 1 + 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%