2018
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiy039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of heterotrophy in chrysophytes as reflected by comparative transcriptomics

Abstract: Shifts in the nutritional mode between phototrophy, mixotrophy and heterotrophy are a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of eukaryotic diversity. The transition between nutritional modes is particularly pronounced in chrysophytes and occurred independently several times through parallel evolution. Thus, chrysophytes provide a unique opportunity for studying the molecular basis of nutritional diversification and of the accompanying pathway reduction and degradation of plastid structures. In order to analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, numerous authors stated and proved a correlation of cell volume and genome size (e.g., Bennett 1972). Additionally, heterotrophic chrysophytes are generally smaller than phototrophic ones, since they do only host remnants of a plastid (Škaloud et al 2014;Grossmann et al 2016;Graupner et al 2018). Following these, we hypothesize phototrophic taxa to have larger genomes than heterotrophic ones, due to the differences in cell sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, numerous authors stated and proved a correlation of cell volume and genome size (e.g., Bennett 1972). Additionally, heterotrophic chrysophytes are generally smaller than phototrophic ones, since they do only host remnants of a plastid (Škaloud et al 2014;Grossmann et al 2016;Graupner et al 2018). Following these, we hypothesize phototrophic taxa to have larger genomes than heterotrophic ones, due to the differences in cell sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the heterotrophic Paraphysomonadida also branch basal indicating that the loss of phototrophy occurred early in some branches of Chrysophyceae . As the basal branching pattern is not yet sufficiently resolved, we cannot fully exclude the possibility of early heterotrophic ancestors within Chrysophyceae even though such a scenario appears highly unlikely as it would require secondary "revival" of the plastid and plastid metabolism (Graupner et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E. longa thus joins the group of recently discovered plastid-bearing eukaryotes lacking the MEP pathway, namely the colourless diatom Nitzschia sp. NIES-3581 (Kamikawa et al 2017) and various colourless chrysophytes (Graupner et al 2018; Dorrell et al 2019). In contrast, the plastid-localized MEP pathway in apicomplexans and related alveolates (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of them have a similar metabolic capacity as the apicoplast (Sanchez-Puerta et al 2007; Slamovits and Keeling 2008; Fernández Robledo et al 2011), and some house an even more complex metabolism that includes amino acid biosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism pathways (Borza et al 2005; Pombert et al 2014; Smith and Lee 2014). Until recently, IPP synthesis seemed to be a process conserved even in the most reduced relic plastids, such as the genome-lacking plastids of certain alveolates (Matsuzaki et al 2008; Janouškovec et al 2015), but non-photosynthetic plastids lacking the characteristic plastidial (MEP or DOXP) pathway of IPP biosynthesis are now known (Kamikawa et al 2017; Graupner et al 2018; Dorrell et al 2019). Thus, there is generally a metabolic reason for a plastid retention, although the cases of plastid dependency differ between lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%