2002
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.36546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of hepatitis C viral quasispecies after liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis that virus evolution can drive disease progression is supported further by the observation that the population diversity, as well as the ratio of amino acid changing to silent substitutions was higher in individuals with severe liver disease (Cabot et al, 2000;Curran et al, 2002). Similar patterns have been observed in studies of virus evolution following liver transplants in patients with mild and severe disease (Lyra et al, 2002). Investigation of the expected patterns of diversity and rates of evolution in patients with different severity of disease under various assumptions will benefit from further mathematical modelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The hypothesis that virus evolution can drive disease progression is supported further by the observation that the population diversity, as well as the ratio of amino acid changing to silent substitutions was higher in individuals with severe liver disease (Cabot et al, 2000;Curran et al, 2002). Similar patterns have been observed in studies of virus evolution following liver transplants in patients with mild and severe disease (Lyra et al, 2002). Investigation of the expected patterns of diversity and rates of evolution in patients with different severity of disease under various assumptions will benefit from further mathematical modelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This concept is very difficult to test with data. Studies have quantified sequence diversity and the rate of virus evolution in patients who differ in the severity of liver disease (Cabot et al, 2000;Curran et al, 2002;Farci, 2001;Lyra et al, 2002;Major et al, 1999;Thomson et al, 2001). Even if virus evolution does drive disease progression -as suggested here -this does not mean that one would expect higher virus diversity or faster evolution in patients with severe compared to mild disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 The transmission and propagation of the major pretransplant sequence was associated with more progressive disease in one study and correlations like with disease outcomes are conflicting. 20,21,45,46 However, we can propose some questions that require answering: Do the following prognosticate different outcomes?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that in the context of a new environment and transplant related factors, which include immunosuppression and a new liver, the genetic codes of both CD 81 binding regions are kept relatively stable. Other regions of the HCV genetic code, such as hypervariable region 1 (HVR1), NS2 and NS3 have been reported to undergo considerable variability as soon as a few months after liver transplantation [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%