2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of grain size distribution in galactic discs

Abstract: Context. Dust is formed out of stellar material and is constantly affected by different mechanisms occurring in the ISM. Dust grains behave differently under these mechanisms depending on their sizes, and therefore the dust grain size distribution also evolves as part of the dust evolution itself. Following how the grain size distribution evolves is a difficult computing task that is just recently being overtaking. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations of a single galaxy as well as cosmological simu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(117 reference statements)
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already remarked, with the present implementation we obtain low redshift values of 𝑆/𝐿 similar to those inferred from dust reprocessing models 0.2 − 0.3 (e.g. Silva et al 1998;Weingartner & Draine 2001;Relaño et al 2020), while C6_SharpShat runs predict in the last few Gyrs unsatisfactory values 𝑆/𝐿 0.05. McKinnon et al (2018) suggested that the ISM dust loss due to the formation of stars, that is the so-called astration, can be neglected in a full dust evolution model because other dust destruction mechanisms, in particular SNae destruction (Section 2.3.4), would largely dominate it.…”
Section: Sharp Shatteringsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As already remarked, with the present implementation we obtain low redshift values of 𝑆/𝐿 similar to those inferred from dust reprocessing models 0.2 − 0.3 (e.g. Silva et al 1998;Weingartner & Draine 2001;Relaño et al 2020), while C6_SharpShat runs predict in the last few Gyrs unsatisfactory values 𝑆/𝐿 0.05. McKinnon et al (2018) suggested that the ISM dust loss due to the formation of stars, that is the so-called astration, can be neglected in a full dust evolution model because other dust destruction mechanisms, in particular SNae destruction (Section 2.3.4), would largely dominate it.…”
Section: Sharp Shatteringsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As before, however, the simulation of Hou et al (2019) still relies on a sub-grid treatment for the dense gas fraction. It is also interesting that the ratio between small-and large-grain abundances calculated by Hou et al (2019) is consistent with that derived from the dust emission SEDs of nearby galaxies (Relaño et al 2020). With empirical information on the grain size distribution and individual dust components, we could further calculate the IR SED by assuming a typical interstellar radiation field as heating source, which would enable a future comparison between our model results and observations.…”
Section: Other Simulations Of the Grain Size Distributionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In addition to dust growth, models show that star formation history (Zhukovska 2014) and the change in dust size distributions (e.g. coagulation and shattering; Hirashita & Kuo 2011;Relaño et al 2020) also affect D/M. Simulations also suggest that the resolved D/M is correlated with a galaxy's gas fraction (f gas , the fraction of gas mass to the total gas and stellar mass) and stellar mass distribution (Hou et al 2019;Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%