Evolution of generic flight vehicle design synthesis

Abstract

the next generation of aerospace life-cycle synthesis systems, a software and management process capable to immediately calculate cost and time implications while simultaneously linking design, manufacturing, testing, and operation. A historical review of how design has been accomplished until today is presented. The design approaches are categorised and the characteristics of today's stateof-the-art design synthesis systems are discussed. A specification for the new class of intelligent generic design synthesis systems is presented capable of satisfying the demands imposed by the new breed of high-performance aircraft, space access vehicles, space missions, and others. Finally, the development status of the next generation aerospace vehicle design synthesis (AVDS-PrADO) simulation-based acquisition environment is presented. NOMENCLATURE AVDaerospace vehicle design AVDS aerospace vehicle design synthesis BWB blended-wing body C certification CAD computer-aided design CAM computer-aided manufacturing CD conceptual design CFD computational fluid dynamics ABSTRACTWhen defining a new product like an aircraft, space access vehicle or space mission, the Advanced Projects Group evaluates the available design space and compares it with the design space required to accomplish the specified mission. As with any product development process, the general life-cycle characteristics are established first during the conceptual design (CD) phase, clearly before a design proposal can be released to the follow-on design phases such as preliminary design (PD), detail design (DD), flight test (FT), and finally operation and disposal. As a rule of thumb, it can be assumed that around 80% of the flight vehicle configuration and mission tandem are determined during the CD phase alone, which is the key phase where the initial brainstorming has to take place. Clearly, it is the responsibility of the CD team to simulate the entire life-cycle of the project from 'cradle to grave' where the focus is on correctness rather accuracy in order to identify the design space and offer an overall proof of design convergence. Currently, the important primary aerospace vehicle and mission design decisions at CD level are still made using extremely simple analysis and heuristics. A reason for this scenario is the difficulty in synthesising the range of individual design disciplines for both, classical and novel aerospace vehicle conceptual designs, in more than an ad hoc fashion.Although the CD segment is seen as the most important step in the product development phase due to its pre-defining function, it is the least well understood part of the entire product evolution process due to its level of abstraction. This paper presents the roadmap towards 'Managerial implication of computerised aircraft design synthesis' -revisitedThe potential of computerised synthesis on product development is well recognised in the multi-disciplinary analysis (MDA) and multidisciplinary optimisation (MDO) engineering domains. However, it appears that the implications of to...

Strategic forecasting in uncertain environments: hypersonic cruise vehicle research and development case study

“…The idealised forecasting system requires to seamlessly connect the three logical decision-support elements (DB, KB, PP) into a product development environment in order to realise the following desired capability: to assess the performance of a novel product in a multi-disciplinary synthesis platform using proven, justifiable methods and considering the most complete supporting information available. (5)…”

“…While the database effort alone is the focus of this paper, the integrated DB interfacing with the knowledge-base (KB) and parametric analysis kernel (PP) environments is the end-goal (10)(11) . Figure 1 shows the overall methodology implemented for total systems forecasting and the associated tools required (5) .…”

Variability-Aware Design of Space Systems: Variability Modelling, Configuration Workflow and Research Directions

“…The very first phase is known as Conceptual Design (CD). It is also the most important phase because crucial decisions are frozen at this phase account for 80% of the total lifecycle cost [12]. These decisions can determine a system to be a success or a failure, be cost-effective or cost-inefficient, be feasible or not.…”