1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8871-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Fault Tolerant Switching Systems in AT&T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the six faults that may have contributed to the 1200-900 cal years B.P. cluster (each >5% of the total rate), two (the Seattle main thrust and Boulder Creek faults) have had previous earthquakes within the 16,000 year record apparently without any on the other four. Thus, the relevance of this type of synchronization model to this study remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the six faults that may have contributed to the 1200-900 cal years B.P. cluster (each >5% of the total rate), two (the Seattle main thrust and Boulder Creek faults) have had previous earthquakes within the 16,000 year record apparently without any on the other four. Thus, the relevance of this type of synchronization model to this study remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the 4ESS switches achieved observed downtime (from all causes) of less than 2 hours per 40 years, or about 5.7 . 10 -6 unavailability [4]; a recent analysis [15] indicates that software failure accounts for only 2% of telephone service outage time experienced by customers.…”
Section: What Levels Of Reliability Are Currently Achievable?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment and the maintenance of a telephone communication path is largely the result of a hardware solution built into specialized and expensive equipment. In addition, the dependable execution of services is determined by an array of software techniques embedded in the central office switches [1]. This approach to dependability is the cornerstone of the guaranteed delivery of service quality.…”
Section: I) Who Pays For What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the average down time of central office switching equipment is expected, as a de facto standard, not to exceed three hours in forty years of operation. This high equipment availability is achieved by relying on different mechanisms: hardware redundancy with built-in fault detection and correction, speedy hardware based switch-over of stand-by units, and software-based mechanisms for data integrity and correction, and for recovery escalation [1]. Due to the need to satisfy stringent real-time system performance requirements, this array of techniques yields hardware which is highly specialized, produced at low volumes and costly.…”
Section: Introduction: the Clash Of The Titansmentioning
confidence: 99%