A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7603-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of epidemiologic methods and concepts in selected textbooks of the 20th century

Abstract: Introductory note by Alfredo MorabiaThis article closes the series of contributions on the history of epidemiologic methods and concepts. It traces, in some epidemiology textbooks published in the 20 th century, the evolution of the way five main topics have been taught: study designs (cohort studies and case-control studies), confounding, bias, interaction, and causal inference. These correspond to the topics covered by the other papers in the series. The only exception is the concept of interaction, for whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used calendar year as the matching variable to provide a reference point for variables that were difficult to achieve comparability between cases and controls, and also to control for possible time trend [37,38]. The selection of matching variables was determined by their potential confounding role indicated in suicide and selfimmolation literature [39].…”
Section: Study Design Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used calendar year as the matching variable to provide a reference point for variables that were difficult to achieve comparability between cases and controls, and also to control for possible time trend [37,38]. The selection of matching variables was determined by their potential confounding role indicated in suicide and selfimmolation literature [39].…”
Section: Study Design Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of general textbooks will not reveal the ‘state of the art’ or ‘cutting edge’ methodologies that are currently in development, or even in use. But what it does expose are the methods and theories that have come to be widely accepted within the field [ 42 ]. Authors of epidemiology textbooks should afford more attention to the neglected areas of measuring disease burden and the development of morbidity metrics and tools for the prioritisation of population health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His innovative concepts, such as study-base, dynamic population, etc., have revolutionized the way study designs and measures of effect are conceived. (…) We speculate that because of a convoluted style, which aggravates the complexity of the new material, the novelty of the approach was first only understood by a small circle of students, who re-expressed the new concepts and made them accessible to a wider audience'' [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the summer semester of 2003, my Epidemiology class at Columbia University reviewed a series of epidemiology textbooks, starting with Major Greenwood's 1935 Epidemics and Crowd Diseases up to Kenneth J Rothman's 1986 Modern Epidemiology [1]. Among them was Olli Miettinen's 1985 Theoretical Epidemiology [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%