1998
DOI: 10.1109/36.718636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of electromagnetic signatures of sea ice from initial formation to the establishment of thick first-year ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The least sensitivity to thickness of thin ice was observed for the N90 algorithm; the SIC obtained by this algorithm was independent of SIT values already at thicknesses of 20-25 cm. This is caused most likely by a smaller penetration depth in the near-90 GHz channels (shorter wave length) (see also Grenfell et al, 1998). OSISAF and CV had the second least sensitivity (levelled off at 25-30 cm), which adds more weight to the choice of an OSISAF-like combination as an optimal algorithm.…”
Section: Thin Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least sensitivity to thickness of thin ice was observed for the N90 algorithm; the SIC obtained by this algorithm was independent of SIT values already at thicknesses of 20-25 cm. This is caused most likely by a smaller penetration depth in the near-90 GHz channels (shorter wave length) (see also Grenfell et al, 1998). OSISAF and CV had the second least sensitivity (levelled off at 25-30 cm), which adds more weight to the choice of an OSISAF-like combination as an optimal algorithm.…”
Section: Thin Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frost flower growth on the newly forming ice was ubiquitous during this study [Perovich and Richter-Menge, 1994]. Laboratory optical studies showed that the presence of frost flowers on young ice caused an increase of 0.1-0.2 in albedo [Grenfell et al, 1998]. Their influence was simulated by adding a thin surface layer with the optical properties of wet snow [Grenfell and Maykut, 1977] …”
Section: Ice Productionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Later laboratory and field studies (Barber et al [74], Grenfell [75]) showed that the backscatter of sea ice undergoes a profound evolution as the ice grows and changes. However, because multiple sea ice states can have the same backscatter values (Grenfell et al [76]), backscatter at a single pixel is insufficient to distinguish between ice categories. Steffen and Heinrichs [77], using Landsat data as "truth", found that first-year and old ice in winter can be separated using single-point C-band SAR backscatter but that performance is much worse in other seasons and for the thinner ice types.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sar Data For Sea-ice Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%