1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb03785.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EVOLUTION OF DRIVING X CHROMOSOMES AND RESISTANCE FACTORS IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OFDROSOPHILA SIMULANS

Abstract: Abstract.-Sex-ratio drive is a particular case of meiotic drive, described in several Drosophila species, that causes males bearing driving X chromosome to produce a large excess of females in their progeny. In Drosophila simulans, driving X chromosomes and resistance factors located on the Y chromosome and on the autosomes have been previously reported. In this paper, we report the study of the dynamics of sex-ratio factors in experimental populations. We followed the evolution in frequency of driving X chrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second potential source of bias is the preferential reporting of studies that found a particular relationship. However, four of the papers included only report fertility as a secondary point and did not mention it in the abstract (Hartl et al 1967;Capillon and Atlan 1999;Tao et al 2001;Orr and Irving 2005). In two further papers, fertility was not a major focus of the paper (Wood and Newton 1991;Beckenbach 1996), and in two others a large number of male traits were examined in which fertility was included (Beukeboom 1994;Snook et al 2000).…”
Section: Potential Effects Of Reporting Biasmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second potential source of bias is the preferential reporting of studies that found a particular relationship. However, four of the papers included only report fertility as a secondary point and did not mention it in the abstract (Hartl et al 1967;Capillon and Atlan 1999;Tao et al 2001;Orr and Irving 2005). In two further papers, fertility was not a major focus of the paper (Wood and Newton 1991;Beckenbach 1996), and in two others a large number of male traits were examined in which fertility was included (Beukeboom 1994;Snook et al 2000).…”
Section: Potential Effects Of Reporting Biasmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies that report no difference in fertility between SR and standard males are either a large scale population cage experiment (Capillon and Atlan 1999) or a field study (Beckenbach 1996), which estimate fertility effects from overall population results, whereas those demonstrating differences are detailed studies of individual flies (Wu 1983a;Atlan et al 2004). Clearly the methodology used can have significant impacts on the results, suggesting that the fertility differences are only revealed in circumstances that allow multiple mating.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the Middle Eastern populations, suppression seems to be increasing much more quickly in one population than in the other, possibly reflecting Y-linked resistance as opposed to autosomal suppression dynamics. In both species, the increase in suppression in response to SR fixation had been shown in experimental populations (Carvalho et al 1998;Capillon and Atlan 1999).…”
Section: Evolution Of Suppressorsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Such a frequency-dependent mechanism is possibly widespread because sex-ratio X chromosomes are known in several species to reduce male fertility when mating occurs repeatedly (Wu 1983a;Jaenike 1996). Density-dependent deleterious effects, related to sexual competition between males, were also invoked to explain the elimination of sex-ratio X from experimental populations of D. simulans (Capillon and Atlan 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%