2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of deghosting process for single‐sensor streamer data from 2D to 3D

Abstract: In marine acquisition, reflections of sound energy from the water–air interface result in ghosts in the seismic data, both in the source side and the receiver side. Ghosts limit the bandwidth of the useful signal and blur the final image. The process to separate the ghost and primary signals, called the deghosting process, can fill the ghost notch, broaden the frequency band, and help achieve high‐resolution images. Low‐signal‐to‐noise ratio near the notch frequencies and 3D effects are two challenges that the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiplying the recorded pressure signal by the deghosting operator 𝑢(𝑓 ) reconstructs the primary wave without the ghost. As described in the 'Introduction' section, plane-wave decomposition is conventionally used, where the angle of incidence 𝜃 is directly linked to the slope (or slowness) 𝑠 of a recorded event, and the ghost time delay 𝜏 can be written as (Zhang et al, 2018)…”
Section: Deghosting Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiplying the recorded pressure signal by the deghosting operator 𝑢(𝑓 ) reconstructs the primary wave without the ghost. As described in the 'Introduction' section, plane-wave decomposition is conventionally used, where the angle of incidence 𝜃 is directly linked to the slope (or slowness) 𝑠 of a recorded event, and the ghost time delay 𝜏 can be written as (Zhang et al, 2018)…”
Section: Deghosting Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these techniques are based on plane-wave decomposition, where each 2D plane-wave in the original time-space data can be mapped to its incident angle for convenience, as the ghost time delay is mainly influenced by the angle of incidence of each single event. For example, the linear Radon transformation can be employed to analyse the recorded data in the time domain, followed by the direct application of the deghosting operator in the frequency-slowness domain before applying the inverse linear Radon transform (Masoomzadeh & Woodburn, 2013;Robertsson & Amundsen, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015Zhang et al, , 2018. Similarly, the deghosting operator can also be applied in the frequency-wavenumber (f-k) domain, where, for a given frequency component, each plane-wave is mapped to a specific coefficient in f-k space (Amundsen, 1993;Robinson & Treitel, 2008;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an ideal case of RTM, seismic data free of surface reflection are extrapolated from receivers, and purely down‐going waves are directly extrapolated from the source. This pre‐processing procedure is also referred to as the deghost processing (Zhang et al., 2018), which can be implemented in various ways, for example the deghost processing in τ‐p domain (Wang et al., 2013). On the other hand, as the development of advanced acquisition technology, the dual‐sensor streamers can record both acoustic pressures and vertical particle velocities at the same location, as well as 4C datasets are available with ocean‐bottom cables or nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hydrophone‐only data, the simplest deghosting method uses the far‐field source signature and deterministic deconvolution (Jovanovich et al., 1983), assuming vertical ray paths. Recently, more advanced deghosting methods have been developed, such as frequency–slowness domain inversion (Zhang et al., 2018), τp$\tau - p$ domain inversion (King & Poole, 2015; Masoomzadeh & Woodburn, 2013; Poole, 2013; Poole & Cooper, 2018; Rickett et al., 2014), inverse Fourier transform deghosting (Amundsen & Zhou, 2013), space‐domain deghosting based on Green's functions (Amundsen, Zhou, et al., 2013; Amundsen, Weglein, et al., 2013) or joint deconvolution of a migration and a mirror migration (Soubaras, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%