2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010tc002687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of deep‐water rifted margins: Testing depth‐dependent extensional models

Abstract: [1] A general understanding of rifted margins, which form by thinning of the continental lithosphere, exists. Nevertheless, the exact form of thinning is unclear. This debate has been stimulated by acquisition of dense seismic wide-angle and deep reflection surveys from Atlantic Ocean margins. A central issue concerns the way in which thinning changes with depth. We have tackled this issue by developing a generalized inverse model. This model attempts to fit subsidence and crustal thinning observations by vary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(246 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by locating the region of plume impact from maximum denudation and increased magmatism, these issues can be circumvented. Moreover, a recent assessment of paleo-water depths at deep-water margins (Crosby et al, 2011) indicated that uncertainties can be greatly reduced by sticking to a few rules: (1) using negligible bathymetry at the start of rifting, (2) using geometry of seismic reflectors, such as clinoforms, indicative of potential changes in paleobathymetry, and (3) relating the predicted time-depth cooling of nearby oceanic crust to deep-water margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by locating the region of plume impact from maximum denudation and increased magmatism, these issues can be circumvented. Moreover, a recent assessment of paleo-water depths at deep-water margins (Crosby et al, 2011) indicated that uncertainties can be greatly reduced by sticking to a few rules: (1) using negligible bathymetry at the start of rifting, (2) using geometry of seismic reflectors, such as clinoforms, indicative of potential changes in paleobathymetry, and (3) relating the predicted time-depth cooling of nearby oceanic crust to deep-water margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, the thickness of the lithosphere of the African margin is 100 km at the trench, and 65‐km beneath the Aegean volcanic arc, suggesting that the African lithosphere is thinned as it is being subducted and recycled in the upper mantle. It worthwhile to note that, in Apulia, both for a “Type I” rifted margin, where continental lithospheric mantle is removed, and “Type II” rifted margin (due to the proximity of the ocean‐continent boundary), the mean value of the thickness of the lithosphere should be similar to the lithospheric thickness of the adjoined oceanic plate [ Crosby et al , 2011]. Such an interpretation does not agree with the classical thermal model for the thickening of the oceanic lithosphere where the lithosphere of a 200 My old oceanic plate would be more than 100 km thick, supporting the idea of a different process for the evolution of the LAB in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published maps of residual topography often use global grids of sedimentary and crustal thicknesses to estimate water‐loaded subsidence [ Colin and Fleitout , ; Panasyuk and Hager , ; Kaban et al ., ; Steinberge , ; Crosby and McKenzie , ]. Unfortunately, there are significant errors in existing digital grids, especially on the oldest, highly sedimented oceanic crust [ Crosby et al ., ]. Winterbourne et al .…”
Section: Residual Topography Of Oceanic Lithospherementioning
confidence: 99%