2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-020-09529-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Cranial Ontogeny in South American Canids (Carnivora: Canidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with previous evidence that stabilizing selection is the dominant evolutionary process shaping mammalian morphological diversification (5,7,9). Our results further indicate that stabilizing selection is more expressive for shape than for size, consistent with the idea that shape is more constrained by functional demands than size (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results agree with previous evidence that stabilizing selection is the dominant evolutionary process shaping mammalian morphological diversification (5,7,9). Our results further indicate that stabilizing selection is more expressive for shape than for size, consistent with the idea that shape is more constrained by functional demands than size (31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When lineages escape such region, thus invading a new adaptive zone, this is usually associated with more intense changes in morphology and ecology, a feature usually observed in major evolutionary transitions and inovations (42,43). If, as some have suggested, shape features are more strongly associated with functional demands (44)(45)(46)(47)(48), than changes in functional requirements would probably lead to shape evolution, and possibly to the invasion of a new adaptive zone (31,47). Size changes, on the other hand are less likely to impact ecomorphological relationships, being associated with within-zones evolution (31,47).…”
Section: Mode Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this test, the ontogenetic trajectories from two different species were compared before and after erasing part of the observations. This experiment was performed on the same two datasets as Test 1, plus a third dataset of cranial shape in canids (Urocyon cinereoargenteus and Cerdocyon thous; Segura, 2014Segura, , 2015Segura et al, 2021). The steps involved in the test were:…”
Section: Test 2: Comparison Of Two Real Ontogenetic Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of shape change at a macroevolutionary scale has been stimulated by the development of new methodological approximations for the phylogenetic analysis of geometric morphometric (GM) data (Catalano et al, 2010;Klingenberg and Gidaszewski, 2010;Parins-Fukuchi, 2018;Adams and Collyer, 2019). Studies that include the phylogenetic dimension in GM analyses have been oriented to evaluate a variety of questions including shape/function relationship (Cooke and Terhune, 2015;Borgard et al, 2020), shape covariation (Machado et al, 2018), rates of evolutionary change (Houle et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2019), morphological evolution (Stayton, 2004;Duport Bru et al, 2019;Segura et al, 2021), morphological disparity (Stange et al, 2018;Schaeffer et al, 2019), and phylogenetic inference (Ascarrunz et al, 2019). In particular, the role of changes in developmental timing in generating the shape diversity has been the subject of several recent studies in both extant (Esquerré et al, 2017;Morris et al, 2019;Sherratt et al, 2019) and fossil species (Maiorino et al, 2013;Foth et al, 2016;Prieto-Márquez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerdocyonina is a lineage of South‐American endemic canids that include some of the least‐known extant canid species (Figure 1, Chavez et al, 2022; DeMatteo & Loiselle, 2008; Pitman & Beisiegel, 2013; Tensen, 2018). This group comprises generalist fox‐like morphotypes ( Cerdocyon , Atelocynus and Lycalopex ), as well as highly specialised species such as the maned wolf ( Chrysocyon brachyurus ) and the bush dog ( Speothos venaticus , Chavez et al, 2022; Lindblad‐Toh et al, 2005; Segura et al, 2021; Wozencraft, 2005). Most Cerdocyonina are mesocarnivores (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%