2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of cellular automata with memory: The Density Classification Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Martins and Oliveira discovered various couples and triples of rules that solve the problem when applied sequentially and for a fixed number of steps [MdO05] that depends on lattice size. Some authors also proposed to embed a memory in the cells to enhance the abilities of the rules [ASB09,SB09].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Martins and Oliveira discovered various couples and triples of rules that solve the problem when applied sequentially and for a fixed number of steps [MdO05] that depends on lattice size. Some authors also proposed to embed a memory in the cells to enhance the abilities of the rules [ASB09,SB09].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, probabilistic cellular automata [32] or cellular automata with memory [33,34]. Besides, other kind of complex systems could be analysed with these methods, as coupled map lattices and random boolean networks [32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is applied to solve economic load dispatch and combined economic and emission load dispatch problems. Reference [21] investigates the evolving ability of a cellular automaton with a type of memory based on the least mean square algorithm. Reference [22] presents a memory-efficient stochastic evolution-based algorithm for solving multiobjective shortest path problems.…”
Section: Memory-based Evolutionary Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing their results and convergence, it is easy to observe the performance advantage of HMPSO over its competitors. The last three rows in Table III indicate that the numbers of functions for which HMPSO are better than CPSO-H6, CLPSO, ALCPSO, FIPS, HPSO-TVAC, EDA-PSO, and PSEDA are 21,18,21,25,22,27, and 27, respectively. The numbers of functions for which they are similar to 1.…”
Section: B Comparison With Seven Pso Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%