“…In Mayer s (1910: p. 507) opinion the most characteristic features for specific distinction are the shape and size of the pedalia and the number and character (branched or unbranched) of the velar canals . Therefore, species were first established and later on renamed or regrouped and vice versa as in the cases of Carybdea arborifera (Maas 1897, 1903, Mayer 1906, Mayer 1910, Bentlage et al 2010, Crow et al 2015, Carybdea xaymacana Conant, 1897(Conant 1897, Bigelow 1938, Studebaker 1972 and Alatina alata (Reynaud, 1830) (Reynaud 1830, Mayer 1906, Gershwin 2005a,b, Bentlage et al 2010, Lewis et al 2013. Such changes occurred because in the opinion of the leading scientists of the first half of the 20 th century, the biodiversity of the genus Carybdea was less numerous than indicated by Haeckel (1880) and should had been reduced to one, two or maximally three species, Carybdea alata, Carybdea marsupialis and/or Carybdea rastonii, depending on the author (Maas 1897, 1903, Bigelow 1909, 1938, Mayer 1910, Stiasny 1919, Thiel 1928, 1936, Kramp 1961).…”