2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2017.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of biogeographic disjunction between eastern Asia and North America in Chamaecyparis : Insights from ecological niche models

Abstract: The disjunct distribution of plants between eastern Asia (EA) and North America (NA) is one of the most well-known biogeographic patterns. However, the formation and historical process of this pattern have been long debated. Chamaecyparis is a good model to test previous hypotheses about the formation of this disjunct pattern as it contains six species disjunctly distributed in EA, western North America (WNA) and eastern North America (ENA). In this study, we applied ecological niche models to test the formati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quality control was performed on the occurrence data [ 38 ]: a) eliminating repeated data; b) completing the coordinates of sites that had an accurate description of the site but lacked latitude-longitude information (using GEOLocate [ www.museum.tulane.edu/geolocate ] and Google Earth); and, c) eliminating data which coordinates did not match the description provided for the site. Finally, in order to achieve a spatial resolution similar to that of the climate data (see below) and to minimize possible effects of sampling bias and spatial autocorrelation [ 39 , 40 ], coordinates closer than 2.5 sexagesimal minutes [~ 5km] were discarded (16 in North America and 9 in South America). This resulted in a presence data set of 104 and 177 coordinates for North and South America, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quality control was performed on the occurrence data [ 38 ]: a) eliminating repeated data; b) completing the coordinates of sites that had an accurate description of the site but lacked latitude-longitude information (using GEOLocate [ www.museum.tulane.edu/geolocate ] and Google Earth); and, c) eliminating data which coordinates did not match the description provided for the site. Finally, in order to achieve a spatial resolution similar to that of the climate data (see below) and to minimize possible effects of sampling bias and spatial autocorrelation [ 39 , 40 ], coordinates closer than 2.5 sexagesimal minutes [~ 5km] were discarded (16 in North America and 9 in South America). This resulted in a presence data set of 104 and 177 coordinates for North and South America, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we built and evaluated separate distribution models using the occurrence data for the HI region (39 records) or the KRT region (91 records) (Table S4). This kind of modelling technique is called reciprocal ENM (Fitzpatrick et al, 2007; Peterson et al, 1999), and has often been applied to estimate niche shifts of congeneric species with disjunct distributions (Liu et al, 2017; Quiroga et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quality control was performed by visual inspection of the original data sheets and coordinate projection in maps (using diva‐gis version 7.5.0.0; Scheldeman & Zonneveld, 2010); duplicates and occurrences for which coordinates did not match the site description were eliminated. Finally, in order to achieve a spatial resolution similar to that of the environmental data and to minimize possible effects of geographical sampling bias and spatial autocorrelation, coordinates were thinned to a minimal distance according to the performed analysis (see below; Feng et al., 2019; Fourcade et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Tingley et al., 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%