2020
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of antibiotic cross‐resistance and collateral sensitivity in Staphylococcus epidermidis using the mutant prevention concentration and the mutant selection window

Abstract: In bacteria, evolution of resistance to one antibiotic is frequently associated with increased resistance (cross‐resistance) or increased susceptibility (collateral sensitivity) to other antibiotics. Cross‐resistance and collateral sensitivity are typically evaluated at the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). However, these susceptibility changes are not well characterized with respect to the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), the antibiotic concentration that prevents a single‐step mutation from occur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resistance to fluconazole alone or combined with echinocandin and/or amphotericin B resistance did not affect the susceptibility of C. auris isolates to the medical-grade honey formulation, although the multiresistant isolates tended to be more sensitive. The increased susceptibility of multiresistant microorganisms to alternative treatments has been observed previously, and is known as collateral susceptibility [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Studies including larger numbers of multiresistant isolates should determine whether multiresistant C. auris also demonstrates collateral susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to fluconazole alone or combined with echinocandin and/or amphotericin B resistance did not affect the susceptibility of C. auris isolates to the medical-grade honey formulation, although the multiresistant isolates tended to be more sensitive. The increased susceptibility of multiresistant microorganisms to alternative treatments has been observed previously, and is known as collateral susceptibility [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Studies including larger numbers of multiresistant isolates should determine whether multiresistant C. auris also demonstrates collateral susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of collateral sensitivity is a widespread evolutionary trade-off that occurs in many Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Barbosa et al, 2017;Lozano-Huntelman et al, 2020). Only a limited number of studies have examined collateral sensitivity in Klebsiella pneumoniae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most of this work has been performed using specific laboratory-adapted strains ( 8 12 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 20 ) or a limited number of clinical isolates ( 6 , 13 , 14 , 16 ). While these studies have been vital to our understanding of CS in a wide variety of species, little remains known regarding the extent of evolutionary conservation or the universality of CS and CR across species ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS is when resistance to one antibiotic simultaneously results in susceptibility to another (7). Over the last decade, several studies have considered how resistance evolution toward a single antibiotic effects CS and its converse, crossresistance (CR), for a wide variety of antibiotics and bacterial species (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The results of these works have been used to identify networks of drugs which can be used to drive resistance in a particular direction to take advantage of CS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%