2018
DOI: 10.1002/dc.23967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of a rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) service for endobronchial ultrasound guided (EBUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in a UK Hospital: A 7 year audit

Abstract: ROSE at EBUS FNA provides access to suitable material for molecular testing with increased yields in the form of needle washings for EGFR with FFPE materials for ALK and PDL1 testing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that it is best for the collection of the sample to be performed directly by the cytopathologist who will then evaluate it microscopically, and not by some other professional figure [ 85 ]. In the procedure known as rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), the cytopathologist can smear the material on glass slides, air-dry them, stain them with a quick cytological stain (such as Diff-Quik) and evaluate them for adequacy on the spot, using a microscope [ 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 ]. While a morphological diagnosis can be rendered directly in some cases, the most important thing is that ROSE allows the cytopathologist to perform two crucial steps: sampling can be repeated on the spot if the first smears are inadequate or non-diagnostic, thus greatly reducing the rate of inadequate diagnoses, patient anxiety, and diagnostic delay; by integrating clinical, imaging (ultrasonography, computed tomography) and microscopic cytologic data, the material can be allocated in the best way possible [ 90 , 91 , 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that it is best for the collection of the sample to be performed directly by the cytopathologist who will then evaluate it microscopically, and not by some other professional figure [ 85 ]. In the procedure known as rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), the cytopathologist can smear the material on glass slides, air-dry them, stain them with a quick cytological stain (such as Diff-Quik) and evaluate them for adequacy on the spot, using a microscope [ 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 ]. While a morphological diagnosis can be rendered directly in some cases, the most important thing is that ROSE allows the cytopathologist to perform two crucial steps: sampling can be repeated on the spot if the first smears are inadequate or non-diagnostic, thus greatly reducing the rate of inadequate diagnoses, patient anxiety, and diagnostic delay; by integrating clinical, imaging (ultrasonography, computed tomography) and microscopic cytologic data, the material can be allocated in the best way possible [ 90 , 91 , 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies show patient benefit with noted decrease in the number of required repeat procedures to obtain diagnostic tissue [28][29][30]. Further, most studies that highlight the use of cytology samples for molecular testing have an on-site adequacy assessment component [29][30][31][34][35][36]. Importantly, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently provided clarification related to fine needle aspiration (FNA) and ROSE under CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) 1988.…”
Section: The Use Of Cytopathology Specimens For Molecular Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,3 The value of ROSE is to optimize the benefit of the procedure for patient and doctor as well; for the shake of accurate treatment plan, for the convenience of a single-step surgery process, and for economic reasons. 3,4,5 Not infrequently the clinical and imaging data render similar possible diagnostic which lead to different techniques and approach. 4,5,6 Lytic lesions or single pathological fracture are the most dispute cases which may be caused by neoplastic, inflammation, or a degenerative process.…”
Section: Rapid On Site Evaluation (Rose) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,5 Not infrequently the clinical and imaging data render similar possible diagnostic which lead to different techniques and approach. 4,5,6 Lytic lesions or single pathological fracture are the most dispute cases which may be caused by neoplastic, inflammation, or a degenerative process. 4,6,7 When there's window in the periosteum, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) could be arranged prior to surgery, yet for single lytic or fractured lesion, FNAB is not an option.…”
Section: Rapid On Site Evaluation (Rose) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation