2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of a fault surface from 3D attribute analysis and displacement measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These segments were identified either from the geometry of the surface fault traces, or from the cumulative displacement distributions. Most reported segments are “major segments” as defined in this study, but three studies [ McLeod et al ., ; Mirabella et al ., ; Lohr et al ., ] also report subordinate scales of segmentation. The faults have different lengths (in range 0.6–350 km), ages, slip rates and they developed in different tectonic and geological settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These segments were identified either from the geometry of the surface fault traces, or from the cumulative displacement distributions. Most reported segments are “major segments” as defined in this study, but three studies [ McLeod et al ., ; Mirabella et al ., ; Lohr et al ., ] also report subordinate scales of segmentation. The faults have different lengths (in range 0.6–350 km), ages, slip rates and they developed in different tectonic and geological settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although commonly used, these models have serious limitations: They model simplistic intrusion and fault shapes, such as point source [ Mogi , ; Masterlark , ], tensile [e.g., Okada , ; Amelung et al ., ; Wright et al ., ; Chang et al ., ; Sigmundsson et al ., ], or shear dislocation rectangle [ Okada , ; Shen et al ., ; Gusman et al ., ; Yue et al ., ]. These deformation sources are not representative of the complex shapes of magmatic intrusions or fault planes in nature [e.g., Burchardt , ; Lohr et al ., ; Burchardt et al ., ]. They model static intrusions/fault planes, such that they do not account for the complex magma propagation mechanisms [ Mathieu et al ., ; Abdelmalak et al ., ] or fault mechanics [ Mair and Abe , , ; Brodsky and Lay , ]; It is impossible to quantify the uncertainties of the model results and so to test their robustness. The main reason is that active geological processes occur in the subsurface, so that the results of the modeling cannot be validated by direct observations. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is very typical of segmented faults that grow in displacement and length until they link with neighbouring faults, and consequently build larger master faults (e.g. Ferrill et al 1999;McClay et al 2002;Marchal et al 2003;Walsh et al 2003;Manzocchi et al 2006;Lohr et al 2008;Baudon & Cartwright 2008). We have distinguished six large fault segments, labelled A-F, in Figure 12.…”
Section: Basin Configurationmentioning
confidence: 90%