1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1958.tb02949.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution in Three Genera of Australian Frogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These speciation events appear to have occurred during the Pliocene or late Miocene rather than during the Pleistocene as Main et al (1958) postulated. Only C. georgiana was previously thought to be of Tertiary origin (Main, 1968) and, due to their morphological similarity, a Recent origin was postulated for the C. signifera-C. insignifera species groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These speciation events appear to have occurred during the Pliocene or late Miocene rather than during the Pleistocene as Main et al (1958) postulated. Only C. georgiana was previously thought to be of Tertiary origin (Main, 1968) and, due to their morphological similarity, a Recent origin was postulated for the C. signifera-C. insignifera species groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4), indicating a very strong association between C. georgiana and C. glauerti. The association of C. glauerti and C. georgiana is anomalous only because ofgross similarities in call structure and breeding site between C. glauerti and C. signifera (Main et al, 1958). Alternatively, using morphology, Finch (1951) described C. glauerti as a "doubtful species ... closely related to C. georgiana," while both of these species were hard to distinguish from C. signifera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations