2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00097-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution in impedance at the electrode-skin interface of two types of surface EMG electrodes during long-term recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrode-skin impedance was reduced below 55 k (Hewson et al 2003) using standard skin preparation procedures (i.e., shaving, slight abrasion and cleaning with an alcohol-acetone solution). According to the "Surface Electromyography for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles" recommendations (Hermens et al 2000), surface EMG sensors were placed between the distal tendon and the innervation's zone with respect to the assumed direction of muscle Wbers.…”
Section: Electromyographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrode-skin impedance was reduced below 55 k (Hewson et al 2003) using standard skin preparation procedures (i.e., shaving, slight abrasion and cleaning with an alcohol-acetone solution). According to the "Surface Electromyography for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles" recommendations (Hermens et al 2000), surface EMG sensors were placed between the distal tendon and the innervation's zone with respect to the assumed direction of muscle Wbers.…”
Section: Electromyographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory tests (BOTTIN and REBECCHI, 2002) demonstrated the reliability and stability of the electrode-skin contact over a period of 2h, with a repeatable contact impedance (measured at 20 Hz with 4 ~tARMs test current) decreasing from an initial value (mean+ standard error) of 180-4-15k~Q shortly after application, to a value of 60 -4-20 k~ after 2 h. A dry silver bar electrode array, tested in the same conditions for comparison, showed a much less consistent and reliable behaviour, with values of 320-4-90 k~Q after application and 617-4-120kf~ after 2h. This performance is similar to other types of commercially available electrode for bipolar EMG using a similar 'recessed electrode' technology (HEWSON et al, 2003). The adhesive arrays were also advantageously used in experimental protocols during cycling at 60 revolutions min -1 for 4 min and during explosive contractions , providing negligible movement artifact and consistent performance over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Methods for evaluating clinical electrodes have been developed throughout the years [3,29,42]. There have also emerged some studies on how to evaluate textile electrodes.…”
Section: Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%