1987
DOI: 10.1139/b87-357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évolution du rapport des sexes de populations de Rumex acetosella le long d'une succession postculturale

Abstract: The sex ratios of natural populations of Rumex acetosella L. have been recorded during two growing seasons, along a successional gradient of abandoned agricultural fields of various ages (from 6 months to 15 years old), south of Paris. At the same time, male and female ramets have been collected to determine the resource allocation pattern of the different organs. We have observed that females of Rumex acetosella L. were more frequent than males at the younger stages, and that males predominated at the older o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, non-fiowering youngfield females were found to out-perform males in relation to water stress. This may explain the slight female biased sex ratio observed in recently abandoned old-fields (Escarre et al, 1987). However, as succession proceeds, females may be selectively eliminated due to their greater energy allocation to fruits to the detriment of vegetative reproduction, this reducing their competitive ability in crowded conditions and resulting in a greater sensitivity to stress.…”
Section: Consequences For the Sex Ratio And Niche Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, non-fiowering youngfield females were found to out-perform males in relation to water stress. This may explain the slight female biased sex ratio observed in recently abandoned old-fields (Escarre et al, 1987). However, as succession proceeds, females may be selectively eliminated due to their greater energy allocation to fruits to the detriment of vegetative reproduction, this reducing their competitive ability in crowded conditions and resulting in a greater sensitivity to stress.…”
Section: Consequences For the Sex Ratio And Niche Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose was to determine whether the sexes differed in tbeir physiological responses, which may in turn influence changes in the sex ratio along a successional gradient. This was achieved by quantifying variation in drought tolerance and the capacity to recover after water stress, both in the sexes and in populations of different successional age which represent extremes of the post-cultural gradient and in wbicb biased sex ratios have been previously recorded (Escarre et al, 1987). Clearly, the use of only two populations means that differences interpreted as being linked to successional habitat variation may in fact be influenced by others factors.…”
Section: Introduction Munities: 'Selection By the Physical Environmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have proposed that these features arose as a consequence of the higher reproductive efforts observed in females (reviewed in Lloyd and Webb 1977;Bullock and Bawa 1981;Cipollini et al 1994;Obeso 1997;Purrington and Schmitt 1998;Nicotra 1998;Delph 1999)or because of mating competition among males (Bullock 1982;Bond and Midgley 1988;Menges 1990;Carr 1991;Vasiliauskas and Aarssen 1992;Machon et al 1995;Purrington and Schmitt 1998;reviewed in Freeman et al 1997;Eckhart 1999). In clonal dioecious species, biomass allocation patterns differ between sexes; male plants commonly allocate more resources to clonal structures, such as creeping roots in Rumex acetosella (Putwain and Harper 1972;Escarre´et al 1987;Houssard et al 1992) and runners in the dioecious strawberry (Darwin 1877;Hancock and Bringhurst 1979). Males of Xanthoxylum americanum allocate more biomass to clonal propagation than females in open field sites, but in forest sites where seed production is prone to failure, both sexes exhibited similar biomass allocation patterns (Popp and Reinartz 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The males and females ofa dioecious species may sometimes show differences in growth rates, biomass allocation, and other vegetative characters, or in their spatial distribution or use of resources (Freeman, Klikoff, and Harper, 1976;Grant and Mitton, 1979;Hancock and Bringhurst, 1980;Conn and Blum, 1981;Fox and Harrison, 1981;Gross and Soule, 1981;Meagher and Antonovics, 1982;Vitale and Freeman, 1985;Escarre, Houssard, and Briane, 1987;Agren, 1988;Popp and Reinartz, 1988;Boecklen, Price, and Mopper, 1990). Such observations have led to suggestions that these differences played key roles in the success of separate sexes, or even in the evolution of dioecy (Freeman, Harper, and Ostler, 1980;Cox, 1981;Lovett Doust, O'Brien, and Lovett Doust, 1987;Armstrong and Irvine, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%