Did Darwin Get It Right? 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and the Theory of Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
1,261
1
31

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,396 publications
(1,313 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
1,261
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Nash equilibrium is supposed to be a result of decisions of rational players. John Maynard Smith (1974Smith ( , 1982 has refined this concept of equilibrium to include the stability of Nash equilibria against mutants. He introduced the fundamental notion of an evolutionarily stable strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nash equilibrium is supposed to be a result of decisions of rational players. John Maynard Smith (1974Smith ( , 1982 has refined this concept of equilibrium to include the stability of Nash equilibria against mutants. He introduced the fundamental notion of an evolutionarily stable strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eriksson et al 2004), and dispersal-foraging game (Garay et al 2015a). 3 Observe that the Holling functional response are defined in a similar way (Holling For the monomorphic model, we follow the setup of Maynard Smith (1982). That is, the resident population is monomorphic whereby every individual has resident phenotype p * .…”
Section: Matrix Games Under Time Constraints and The Monomorphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the monomorphic approach of Maynard Smith (1982), we have the following definition (see also Garay et al (2017)). …”
Section: Matrix Games Under Time Constraints and The Monomorphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations