Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1086/324295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and Pulsation of Red Supergiants at Different Metallicities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wasatonic et al (2005) also found dual photometric periods of 350-450 days and 6.16 yr for TV Gem (M1 Iab) and concluded that the 6.16 yr period was the fundamental mode. Only the models more massive than 18 M in Guo & Yi (2002) have fundamental and first overtone periods that have these range of values and luminosities consistent with our revised distance. However, from their analysis of brightness variations in M supergiants, Kiss et al (2006) conclude that the long secondary periods (i.e., >1000 days) are not radial pulsations in accord with Stothers & Leung (1971).…”
Section: Stellar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wasatonic et al (2005) also found dual photometric periods of 350-450 days and 6.16 yr for TV Gem (M1 Iab) and concluded that the 6.16 yr period was the fundamental mode. Only the models more massive than 18 M in Guo & Yi (2002) have fundamental and first overtone periods that have these range of values and luminosities consistent with our revised distance. However, from their analysis of brightness variations in M supergiants, Kiss et al (2006) conclude that the long secondary periods (i.e., >1000 days) are not radial pulsations in accord with Stothers & Leung (1971).…”
Section: Stellar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Turner et al (2006) presented an empirical period-luminosity relation for semi-regular (SRc) M supergiant variables in Per OB1 and Berkeley 87, and found that the relation was consistent with selected linear non-adiabatic pulsation models of Guo & Yi (2002). Betelgeuse shows at least two periods and both the 5.78 yr and 400 day periods are observed in radial velocity and light curves, although the radial velocities and light curves are not tightly correlated.…”
Section: Stellar Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Looking at the positions, for instance, α Her or α Ori, their absolute magnitudes are 1–2 mag fainter than those of the solar metallicity models. According to Guo & Li (2002), δ M bol ∼ 0.83δ log Z , which means that unphysically large metallicities (10–100 times solar) would be needed to account for the low luminosities. A possibility is that heavy circumstellar extinction in K band makes the stars fainter.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Multiperiodic Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they are key agents of nucleosynthesis and chemical evolution of the Galaxy, and have also long been known for their slow optical variations. This variability is usually attributed to radial pulsations (Stothers 1969; Wood, Bessell & Fox 1983; Heger et al 1997; Guo & Li 2002), although irregular variability caused by huge convection cells was also suggested from theory (Schwarzschild 1975; Antia, Chitre & Narasimha 1984) and observations (e.g. Tuthill, Haniff & Baldwin 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Physical reasons for variability in red supergiants such as S Per have been discussed by many authors; see, e.g., Lovy et al (1984), Li & Gong (1994), Heger et al (1997), Bono & Panagia (2000), Guo & Li (2002), and references therein. The conclusion is that the main cause of light variability in red supergiants is variation of the effective temperature due to stellar pulsation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%