2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and phylogeny of old world deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
243
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
25
243
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in the taxonomic scheme followed in this paper 529 (Groves and Grubb 1987), Hylaphus and Axis are placed together under the same genus (Axis), it is 530 not unlikely that these scores reflect a true phylogenetic difference. As already mentioned, more 531 recent molecular and morphological studies (Pitra et al 2004, Meijaard and have 532 argued that Hyelaphus may not be closely related to Axis and should perhaps be placed closer to the 533 subgenus Rusa. 534…”
Section: Linear Morphometric Analysis 399mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although in the taxonomic scheme followed in this paper 529 (Groves and Grubb 1987), Hylaphus and Axis are placed together under the same genus (Axis), it is 530 not unlikely that these scores reflect a true phylogenetic difference. As already mentioned, more 531 recent molecular and morphological studies (Pitra et al 2004, Meijaard and have 532 argued that Hyelaphus may not be closely related to Axis and should perhaps be placed closer to the 533 subgenus Rusa. 534…”
Section: Linear Morphometric Analysis 399mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should however be noted, that at the time von Koenigswald 182 classified these specimens, the Bawean deer (now Axis (Hyelaphus) kuhlii), was considered a member 183 of the subgenus Rusa (von Koenigswald 1933). Moreover the taxonomic position of Hyelaphus is still 184 a matter of controversy and some recent molecular studies support a close relationship between this 185 subgenus and the Cervus (Rusa) timorensis/Cervus (Rusa) unicolor-clade (Pitra et al 2004). 186…”
Section: Introduction 20 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-throughput approach for sequencing was useful for obtaining the whole mitochondrial genome of red deer, so this method could be used broadly among animal taxa. Based on our phylogenetic results using whole mitochondrial genomes, family Cervidae is divided into two subfamilies, Cervinae and Capreolinae, which are also called subfamilies Plesiometacarpalia and Telemetacarpalia [5,7,22,34,37]. The two subfamilies contain five tribes, and four of these, Cervini, Muntiacini, Odocoileinae, and Capreolini, are well determined by the phylogenetic trees of family Cervidae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The placement of two isolates of Przewalskium albirostris also suggest species misidentification as they lay on different branches. The placement as the sister species to a C. nippon and C. elaphus clade seems the appropriate one as suggested by [22]. The other isolate may be attributed to a misidentified specimen of Rusa spp.…”
Section: Acta Biologica Hungarica 67 2016mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation