2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and Kantian morality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These arguments are expanded to m player symmetric games in Alger and Weibull [8]. See Section 3.3 for a discussion of assortativity of types in games with more than two players.…”
Section: Assortativity and Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These arguments are expanded to m player symmetric games in Alger and Weibull [8]. See Section 3.3 for a discussion of assortativity of types in games with more than two players.…”
Section: Assortativity and Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following work in the biology literature on the evolution of assortativity (e.g., Cara et al [77], Dieckmann and Doebeli [102], Matessi et al [234], Otto et al [277], Pennings et al [279], Servedio [321]), Newton [268] shows that under a specification of type-specific assortativity given by Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman [81] and applied to the model of Alger and Weibull [7] discussed in Section 3.1, stability is only possible when an incumbent population behaves efficiently and does not interact at all with invading τ types, thus ensuring that σ = 1 in (8). Perfectly assortative efficient behavior is not susceptible to invasion, but everything else is.…”
Section: Individual Types and Assortativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 If preferences are transmitted across generations and if they a¤ect the expected survival and reproduction-the …tness-of their bearer: which preferences are likely to be favored by evolution and which preferences are likely to disappear? Analysis of the long-term evolution of preference distributions can help understand the proximate drivers and motivation of human behavior in social and economic interactions (Hirshleifer, 1977, Bergstrom, 1996, Binmore 1998, Robson, 2001, Newton, 2018, Alger and Weibull, 2019. Here we build on previous work on strategy evolution in structured populations (Lehmann, Alger, and Weibull, 2015) by studying preference evolution in such populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the existing economics literature on preference evolution in social interactions (see Alger and Weibull, 2019, for a recent survey), our model makes two key innovations. 3 First, it explicitly analyzes the e¤ects of population structure and limited dispersal upon behavior and preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%