1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb06115.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and Diversity of Zooflagellates1

THOMAS CAVALIER‐SMITH
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the profound significance of these differences, we believe the kingdom of Archezoa would be divided into two kingdoms: Proarchezoa (incIuding diplomonads) and Archezoa (including all other archezoa). Both kingdoms belong to the Superkingdom Archezoa (Cavalier-Smith, 1989), which, according to him, had only one kingdom under this superkingdom [16]. It must have been a large anaerobic organism with a size similar to protozoan cells.…”
Section: (D) Nuclear Division Without Spindle Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the profound significance of these differences, we believe the kingdom of Archezoa would be divided into two kingdoms: Proarchezoa (incIuding diplomonads) and Archezoa (including all other archezoa). Both kingdoms belong to the Superkingdom Archezoa (Cavalier-Smith, 1989), which, according to him, had only one kingdom under this superkingdom [16]. It must have been a large anaerobic organism with a size similar to protozoan cells.…”
Section: (D) Nuclear Division Without Spindle Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trichomonads and metamonads (e.g., Giardia) are thought to form two of the earliest branches o the eukaryotic tree of life (Brugerolle 1993;Cavalier-Smith 1993), though much recent evidence has amassed to suggest that their basal placement is arti®cial (Biagini and Bernard 2000;Morin 2000;Roger 1999). The current view of early eukaryotic evolution has been confounded by the discovery of mitochondrial genes in both diplomonads and trichomonads, as well as the questionable accuracy of the small subunit ribosomal RNA phylogenetic tree (Morin 2000;Roger 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%