2007
DOI: 10.1038/nature05615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution and diversity of subduction zones controlled by slab width

Abstract: Subducting slabs provide the main driving force for plate motion and flow in the Earth's mantle, and geodynamic, seismic and geochemical studies offer insight into slab dynamics and subduction-induced flow. Most previous geodynamic studies treat subduction zones as either infinite in trench-parallel extent (that is, two-dimensional) or finite in width but fixed in space. Subduction zones and their associated slabs are, however, limited in lateral extent (250-7,400 km) and their three-dimensional geometry evolv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

54
577
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(643 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
54
577
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Models with stronger slabs and slow slab rollback (1 cm/yr) do have shallower slab dips [Cížková et al, 2002]. In addition, 3-D models show that roll-back rate depends on the length of the subduction zone, with short subduction zones exhibiting fast rollback, while the central regions of long subduction zones are stationary [Schellart et al, 2007]. Together with previous 3-D laboratory models [e.g., Funiciello et al, 2003;Bellahsen et al, 2005;Piromallo et al, 2006], Schellart et al [2007] demonstrate the importance of toroidal flow for slab dynamics near slab edges.…”
Section: Subduction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models with stronger slabs and slow slab rollback (1 cm/yr) do have shallower slab dips [Cížková et al, 2002]. In addition, 3-D models show that roll-back rate depends on the length of the subduction zone, with short subduction zones exhibiting fast rollback, while the central regions of long subduction zones are stationary [Schellart et al, 2007]. Together with previous 3-D laboratory models [e.g., Funiciello et al, 2003;Bellahsen et al, 2005;Piromallo et al, 2006], Schellart et al [2007] demonstrate the importance of toroidal flow for slab dynamics near slab edges.…”
Section: Subduction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53] Finally, trench migration is clearly an important factor in several subductions zones, and may be the dominant control on slab dynamics for slabs of short lateral extent, where toroidal flow around the edge of the slab has a strong influence on slab dynamics Stegman et al, 2006;Royden and Husson, 2006;Schellart et al, 2007]. Small slab dips at early stages of subduction are also likely to be controlled by slab roll-back [Gurnis et al, 2004].…”
Section: Other Factors Affecting Slab Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we agree that deep-seated processes related to slab rollback are important for understanding these fundamental convergent margin processes, our compilation in Figure 5 demonstrates that crustal-level collisional processes play a dominant role based on the close spatial and temporal coincidence between collisional events and rotation and rifting events ( Figure 5, Table 1, and Appendix A). These linked processes are not explained by models invoking slab rollback alone [Schellart and Lister, 2004;Schellart, 2004;Schellart et al, 2007].…”
Section: Testing the Collision/subductioninduced Rotation Model At Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Tectonic models invoking mantle-level processes related to slab rollback are widely used to explain arc curvature and back-arc rifting [e.g., Schellart and Lister, 2004;Schellart et al, 2007]. Although we agree that deep-seated processes related to slab rollback are important for understanding these fundamental convergent margin processes, our compilation in Figure 5 demonstrates that crustal-level collisional processes play a dominant role based on the close spatial and temporal coincidence between collisional events and rotation and rifting events ( Figure 5, Table 1, and Appendix A).…”
Section: Testing the Collision/subductioninduced Rotation Model At Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another parameter to consider is the slab width. Indeed, the resisting forces of the mantle to slab roll-back are higher with a wide slab [Faccenna et al, 2007;Schellart et al, 2007;Loiselet et al, 2009], such as in the late…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%