1997
DOI: 10.2307/4450382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution & Religious Beliefs: A Survey of Pennsylvania High School Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between professed religious conviction and lack of acceptance of evolutionary theory seems to hold true for biology teachers as well. Aguillard (1999) and Osif (1997) conducted research in Louisiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania and found that biology teachers who rejected the theory of evolution often endorsed the teaching of creationism. Additionally, the biology teachers who rejected evolution often professed their rejection based upon religious convictions.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between professed religious conviction and lack of acceptance of evolutionary theory seems to hold true for biology teachers as well. Aguillard (1999) and Osif (1997) conducted research in Louisiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania and found that biology teachers who rejected the theory of evolution often endorsed the teaching of creationism. Additionally, the biology teachers who rejected evolution often professed their rejection based upon religious convictions.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six weeks after the conclusion of the initial mailings, the returned surveys were analyzed for correlations between biology teachers' understanding of the nature of science, understanding of the theory of evolution, acceptance of the theory of evolution, degree of religious conviction, and presentation of the theory of evolution in their biology courses. The 90-question survey represented a compilation of previous survey questions used by Rutledge and Warden (2000), as well as Osif (1997), and new material added specifically for this study. The first three sections of the survey were presented in near identical form to the Rutledge and Warden survey and used Likert scaling and multiple choice questions to assess biology teachers' acceptance of evolution, understanding of evolution, and understanding of the nature of science (Rutledge & Warden, 2000).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the lay public, both pupils and teachers have an insufficient knowledge of evolution. A difference in knowledge and evolutionary attitudes was not confirmed among secondary school students studying and notstudying biology (Ć orgo et al, 2014), and there was no confirmation of a difference in an understanding of the importance of evolutionary education among biology teachers and English language teachers (Osif, 1997). The same results were found by Nehm, Kim, and Sheppard (2009), who compared the attitudes of secondary school biology teachers and humanities teachers to evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lebanon (Dagher and BouJaoude, 1997), freshman biology majors in the United States (Verhey, 2005), biology majors in Scotland (Downie and Barron, 2000), freshman and senior biology and genetics majors (Rice et al, 2011), biology textbooks (Aleixandre, 1994), high school student teachers (Zuzovsky, 1994), and high school biology teachers (Moore and Kraemer, 2005;Osif, 1997;Tatina, 1989;Van Koevering and Stiehl, 1989 Approximately 50% of the students held attitudes that would be considered creationist (Verhey, 2005).…”
Section: Reasons For Resistance To Beementioning
confidence: 99%