Evolution After Gene Duplication 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470619902.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution AfterandBefore Gene Duplication?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De novo protein emergence provides the genome with great innovative potential to explore the hitherto unexplored sequence space (McLysaght and Hurst 2016;Tautz and Domazet-Lošo 2011;Weisman and Eddy 2017;Van Oss and Carvunis 2019;Rödelsperger et al 2019). In comparison to other known mechanisms of protein emergence that rely on recycling of conserved genetic elements, like duplication (Ohno 1970;Sikosek and Bornberg-Bauer 2010) or gene fusion (Dohmen et al 2020), de novo genes emerge from non-coding regions of the genome (Bornberg-Bauer et al 2021). De novo proteins are shorter on average than new proteins emerging through duplication (Montañés et al 2023) and have low expression that is often restricted to specific tissues or conditions (Heames, J. Schmitz, et al 2020;Wu and Knudson 2018;J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De novo protein emergence provides the genome with great innovative potential to explore the hitherto unexplored sequence space (McLysaght and Hurst 2016;Tautz and Domazet-Lošo 2011;Weisman and Eddy 2017;Van Oss and Carvunis 2019;Rödelsperger et al 2019). In comparison to other known mechanisms of protein emergence that rely on recycling of conserved genetic elements, like duplication (Ohno 1970;Sikosek and Bornberg-Bauer 2010) or gene fusion (Dohmen et al 2020), de novo genes emerge from non-coding regions of the genome (Bornberg-Bauer et al 2021). De novo proteins are shorter on average than new proteins emerging through duplication (Montañés et al 2023) and have low expression that is often restricted to specific tissues or conditions (Heames, J. Schmitz, et al 2020;Wu and Knudson 2018;J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evolutionary stability is consistent with the possibility that the function of sult1st6a may be common to those in other fish species. In contrast, there are little clues about the function of sult1st6y but might be explained by a sort of neofunctionalization among possible evolutionary mechanisms of duplicated genes [ 46 ]: sult1st6y could have been immune from the original role of sult1st6 as a redundant copy, leading to the gain of a new function related to sex development under relaxed selection. Here, it is assumed that some mutations may have occurred in the regulatory region of sult1st6y , which changes the expression pattern but not the enzymatic function itself as estrogen sulfotransferase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De novo protein emergence provides the genome with great innovative potential to explore the hitherto unexplored sequence space ( Tautz and Domazet-Lošo 2011 ; McLysaght and Hurst 2016 ; Weisman and Eddy 2017 ; Rödelsperger et al 2019 ; Van Oss and Carvunis 2019 ). In comparison to other known mechanisms of protein emergence that rely on recycling of conserved genetic elements, like duplication ( Ohno 1970 ; Sikosek and Bornberg-Bauer 2010 ) or gene fusion ( Dohmen et al 2020 ), de novo genes emerge from noncoding regions of the genome ( Bornberg-Bauer et al 2021 ). De novo proteins are shorter on average than new proteins emerging through duplication ( Montañés et al 2023 ) and have low expression that is often restricted to specific tissues or conditions ( Wu and Knudson 2018 ; Heames et al 2020 ; Schmitz et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%