1999
DOI: 10.3989/pirineos.1999.v153-154.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolución de la composición florística Post-fuego en un carrascal de Navarra (n de España)

Abstract: RESUMEN.-Se presentan los resultados de cuatro años de estudio sobre la evolución de la composición florística de un carrascal mediterráneo sometido a fuegos controlados en Navarra (N de España

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest values for the two parameters coincide with the maximum explosion of herbaceous species during the first 4-5 years, and then both decrease. This increase in the richness values in the first few stages has been described by other authors who analysed post-fire vegetation recovery (Naveh and Dann, 1974;Lepart, 1980, 1981;Casal et al, 1990;Bond and Van Wilgen, 1996;Cavero and Ederra, 1999;Naveh, 1999). The decrease in diversity values is produced by the community starting to stabilise or by the changes being brought to a standstill, and this results in a marked dominance of woody species and, in these zones, of Erica australis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The highest values for the two parameters coincide with the maximum explosion of herbaceous species during the first 4-5 years, and then both decrease. This increase in the richness values in the first few stages has been described by other authors who analysed post-fire vegetation recovery (Naveh and Dann, 1974;Lepart, 1980, 1981;Casal et al, 1990;Bond and Van Wilgen, 1996;Cavero and Ederra, 1999;Naveh, 1999). The decrease in diversity values is produced by the community starting to stabilise or by the changes being brought to a standstill, and this results in a marked dominance of woody species and, in these zones, of Erica australis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Dominance indices for transect records: (a) of the most abundant species (DI(1)= 100 (N I / N)), (b) of the two more abundant species (DI(2)= 100 (N I + N II / N)), where N I and N II were the number of contacts of the first and second most abundant species, respectively, and N was the total number of contacts of all species sampled; 5. Relative abundance for transect records: (1) for 23 species, those present at least in half study areas, (2) for species grouped according to their regenerative strategy (resprouter, seeder and resprouter-seeder following Clemente et al 1996;Cavero & Ederra 1999;Lloret et al 2003), (3) for species grouped according to their Raunkiaer biological type (Raunkiaer 1934), based on the position and degree of protection of permanent buds: macrophanerophytes (trees), nanophanerophytes (shrubs), other phanerophytes (palms and vines), chamaephytes (subshrubs), geophytes, hemicryptophytes (perennial forbs and grasses) and therophytes (annuals) (Bolòs et al 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%