Handbook of Consumer Psychology
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809570.ch19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evoking the Imagination as a Strategy of Influence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
3

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(147 reference statements)
2
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Used in this latter fashion, vividness could help contrast the thesis of an argument (figure) against background material (ground). A number of past studies have found results consistent with this distinction (Frey & Eagly, 1993;Kelley, Gaidis, & Reingen, 1989;Kisielius & Sternthal, 1984;Petrova & Cialdini, 2005, 2008, but the present studies are the first to systematically examine the effects of figural versus ground vividness.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Used in this latter fashion, vividness could help contrast the thesis of an argument (figure) against background material (ground). A number of past studies have found results consistent with this distinction (Frey & Eagly, 1993;Kelley, Gaidis, & Reingen, 1989;Kisielius & Sternthal, 1984;Petrova & Cialdini, 2005, 2008, but the present studies are the first to systematically examine the effects of figural versus ground vividness.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Different results have been found though when looking into imagination-imagery's role in processing information (Escalas, 2004;Petrova and Cialdini, 2008;Phillips et al, 1995;Wang and Calder, 2006;Wohlfeil and Whelan, 2012), and not only for imagery-evoking marketing communications but also in the consumption of media hedonic products (Batat and Wohlfeil, 2009;Molesworth, 2009). In these cases, imagery does not seem to facilitate that consumers access their own mental systems and compare the incoming information with them (Lofman, 1991;Schlosser, 2003).…”
Section: Under the Umbrella Of Mental Imagery: Towards Understanding mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This compels us to consider that the effects of imagination-imagery are not always dictated by cognitive elaboration but that other kinds of processes can intervene (see stages 3 and 4 in Figure 3). In particular, the theory of narrative transportation (Gerrig, 1993;Green and Brock, 2000), at first developed to explain readers' story processing, sheds new light on the mechanisms of imagination-imagery (Escalas, 2007;Petrova and Cialdini, 2008). As users do not see the effect that mental imagery could have on them (or they do not wish to interrupt the imagination-imagery experience, which requires many mental resources and proves to be fun), they might be temporarily disconnected from their surrounding reality and feel engrossed in a fantastical milieu (Escalas, 2004(Escalas, , 2007Green and Brock, 2000).…”
Section: Under the Umbrella Of Mental Imagery: Towards Understanding mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other individual differences could be explored in conjunction with consumption visions. Petrova and Cialdini (, p. 514) have argued that two individual differences warrant more research attention: dispositional imagery vividness, or “individuals’ ability to generate vivid mental imagery,” and internal focus. These authors posited as well that people with a higher internal focus are more sensitive to their internal representations and thus to mental imagery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%