2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evoking stress reactivity in virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 222 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress response is complex and involves multiple systems (i.e., neural, neuroendocrine, endocrine), some that respond to acute stress on sort timescales and some that measure chronic stress over longer time frames. Further, as noted by a 2022 meta-analysis [19], physiological systems are differentially activated by types of stressors (e.g., acute social stressors are more likely to increase the hormone cortisol). Since model training data obtains the best predictive results when it captures similar patterns as the testing data [92], the variation in both the psychological and physiological stress response due to task context suggests that models trained using stress signals from one task (e.g., N-back) made not represent the stress in a different task (e.g., VR-ISS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stress response is complex and involves multiple systems (i.e., neural, neuroendocrine, endocrine), some that respond to acute stress on sort timescales and some that measure chronic stress over longer time frames. Further, as noted by a 2022 meta-analysis [19], physiological systems are differentially activated by types of stressors (e.g., acute social stressors are more likely to increase the hormone cortisol). Since model training data obtains the best predictive results when it captures similar patterns as the testing data [92], the variation in both the psychological and physiological stress response due to task context suggests that models trained using stress signals from one task (e.g., N-back) made not represent the stress in a different task (e.g., VR-ISS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is increasing support that the physiological systems activated are those best suited to cope with the type of stressor, rather than the prior theories that certain systems are activated if the stressor magnitude surpasses a threshold [19,20]. For example, stress caused by a traffic jam may cause one individual to show an increase in epinephrine while another individual may show an increase in the stress hormone cortisol with little to no increase of epinephrine.…”
Section: A Time Course Of the Stress Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MR training for MFRs, a biocybernetic feedback loop can be used to steer difficulty levels and stress exposure, through real-time adaptations of the virtual environment. Wearable sensors play a pivotal role in measuring trainees' biosignals, such as heart rate, heart rate variability or skin conductance, which are commonly used biosignals for stress classification (Giannakakis et al, 2022;van Dammen et al, 2022). For instance, if a trainee shows signs of high stress, the environment might be modified to reduce pressure, whereas indications of low engagement could lead to increased challenge.…”
Section: Training Personalization Through Biocybernetic Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMDs offer feasibility, repeatability, and control while leaving space for the development of tangible innovative ideas. Highly realistic virtual environments that recreate real-life scenarios (e.g., train/roller coaster, escaping life-threatening events, reacting to emergencies, high-altitude exposure) or completely fantastic ones or replicate traditional stress tests (e.g., TSST, MAST) into the virtual dimension have been developed and validated [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%