“…When manipulated by a cognitive task with separable task conditions, ERPs and their underlying components can provide direct, quantitative indices of abstract cognitive processes. ERP components can reflect brain activity both in time (high resolution on the order of milliseconds) and in space (electrode location), and their behavior under task conditions has been correlated with memory (Begleiter et al, 1993; Chapman et al, 1978a; Chapman et al, 1981; Friedman et al, 1978; Polich, 2007; Ruchkin et al, 1990; Rugg and Curran, 2007), recognition and familiarity (Morgan et al, 2008; Pfütze et al, 2002; Trenner et al, 2004), semantic meaning (Chapman et al, 1978b), stimulus expectancy (Arbel et al, 2010; Walter et al, 1964), executive functioning (Begleiter and Porjesz, 1975), and stimulus relevance (Chapman and Bragdon, 1964; Chapman, 1965; Chapman et al, 2013), among others. While anatomical imaging methods, such as PET and MRI, may indicate where activity occurs during memory storage and processing, their poor temporal resolution (on the order of seconds) makes it difficult to separate the early post-stimulus sequence of events (Missonnier et al, 2004), including sensory processing, memory storage, and later executive functions such as solving the task.…”