1984
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(84)90029-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evoked potentials in patients with Huntington's disease and their offspring. I. Somatosensory evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the CAT scan and evoked potentials were in good agreement with the diag nosis of HD [1][2][3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The results of the CAT scan and evoked potentials were in good agreement with the diag nosis of HD [1][2][3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In earlier SEP studies, reduction in size of the contralateral parietal NZdP25 response to median nerve stimulation has been described as the prominent feature in patients with manifest HD (21,41,42), while changes in latencies of the cortical responses were negligible. The decrease in the SEP amplitude can already be detected in subjects at risk for HD without any choreatic movements (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The decrease in the SEP amplitude can already be detected in subjects at risk for HD without any choreatic movements (41). Using a noncephalic reference instead of the commonly applied frontal reference, it is possible to discriminate between various parietal and frontal cortical generators in healthy human subjects (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a reduced efficiency of sensorimotor processing may induce an increased force specification. Disturbed sensorimotor activity in HD has been suggested because of a total suppression or reduced activity of the reactive EMG response (Fellows et al 1997;Noth et al 1985), an abnormal (sub)cortical activation during passive sensory stimulation (Boecker et al 1999), changes in somatosensory evoked potentials (Noth et al 1984;Töpper et al 1993) and deficits in feedback control when external perturbations are introduced during reaching movements (Smith et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%