2017
DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2017.1386148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidencing Impact from Art Research: Analysis of Impact Case Studies from the REF 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other common types of evidence were implementing policy or influencing policymakers, industry or other activities (60%), media coverage (52%), the number of events in a festival or other relevant cultural program (52%) and benefit to artists, curators, and cultural institutions (51%). The study argued that it is particularly challenging to provide evidence for artistic impacts in the REF because it requires looking at the opinions or behaviours of wide range of audiences (Brook, 2018). (Jordan & Carrigan, 2018).…”
Section: Content Analyses Of Ref 2014 Impact Cases Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other common types of evidence were implementing policy or influencing policymakers, industry or other activities (60%), media coverage (52%), the number of events in a festival or other relevant cultural program (52%) and benefit to artists, curators, and cultural institutions (51%). The study argued that it is particularly challenging to provide evidence for artistic impacts in the REF because it requires looking at the opinions or behaviours of wide range of audiences (Brook, 2018). (Jordan & Carrigan, 2018).…”
Section: Content Analyses Of Ref 2014 Impact Cases Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies of REF case studies have used text mining (e.g., King's College London and Digital Science, 2015;Parks et al, 2018) or content analysis (e.g., Wilkinson, 2019;Brook, 2018) to identify the types of impacts claimed by researchers, rather than the types of evidence cited. In contrast, one (not peer reviewed) study has listed the 40 websites most cited in impact case studies, broken down into four broad disciplinary groups (Digital Science, 2016) but did not analyse the cited URLs further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pop and Borza (2016) proposes 33 indicators that could be used for museum sustainability measurement. However, these indicators are direct outputs and do not provide information about the impact on the longer-term effects on the beneficiaries' life (Brook 2018). Examples are the number of visitors, the proportion of objects which are conserved perfectly or the number of mentions of the museum in Google.…”
Section: The Need For a New Impact Measurement Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate on the impact of scientific research on society is at the center of attention nowadays, recurrently addressed based on the economic, social, governmental, organizational, technological, cultural, and educational dimensions. The cultural dimension of research impact is confined to stimulating and enriching cultural production and preserving the cultural heritage of nations (Bornmann, 2012;Brook, 2018), thus urging for a deeper understanding of such impact on society cultural and, particularly, symbolic dimensions. Given that symbolism is a key concept in helping us understand ourselves as a society (Bourdieu, 1989;Cassirer, 2001Cassirer, , 2004Cassirer, , 2011Cohen, 1985;Eliade, 1980;Goldschmidt, 1990;Hamlin & Krois, 2004;Jung, 1968;Scheffler, 1997), how come we fail in thinking and considering the impact of research in its entirety upon the symbolic realm?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%