2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.527622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence toward a Dual Phosphatase Mechanism That Restricts Aurora A (Thr-295) Phosphorylation during the Early Embryonic Cell Cycle

Abstract: Background: Aurora A is a spindle-regulating mitotic kinase that has been implicated in controlling CDK1 activation. Results: Inducing an abnormal increase in Aurora A(Thr-295) phosphorylation during late interphase delays CDK1 activation. Conclusion: Aurora A (Thr-295) phosphorylation during late interphase competes for phosphatase activity that also promotes CDK1 activation. Significance: Learning how kinases and phosphatases function as a system is essential to understand cell cycle control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AURKA is degraded at the end of mitosis 58 and thus must be resynthesized during interphase of the next cell cycle. Once translated, AURKA auto-phosphorylates on its own T-loop but this activity is counteracted by the PP1 and PP2A phosphatases in interphase 43 , 59 , 60 and by PP6 while bound to Tpx2 during mitosis 61 . As dephosphorylation maintains AURKA in an inactive state, the crucial question arises as to how AURKA overcomes the repressive effect of PPases to drive mitotic commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AURKA is degraded at the end of mitosis 58 and thus must be resynthesized during interphase of the next cell cycle. Once translated, AURKA auto-phosphorylates on its own T-loop but this activity is counteracted by the PP1 and PP2A phosphatases in interphase 43 , 59 , 60 and by PP6 while bound to Tpx2 during mitosis 61 . As dephosphorylation maintains AURKA in an inactive state, the crucial question arises as to how AURKA overcomes the repressive effect of PPases to drive mitotic commitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While RepoMan’s ability to interact with chromatin is reduced by Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation of S893 [23], interaction with PP1 is diminished by CDK1/cyclin B-mediated phosphorylation at T412 and probably further sites at S400 and T419 [24,25]. On the other hand, phosphatases can also restrict kinase activity by removal of phosphates from the activation loop [48,49], or they even trigger kinase activity as exemplified by CDC25A, which removes an inhibitory phosphorylation from CDK1 [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these proteins have also been shown to be regulated by Cdk1-dependent mitotic phosphorylations. That subset includes Eg5, NuMA, MCAK, Kif4a, Aurora-A, and TPX2 [52][53][54][55][56][57]; NuMA, and TPX2 have also been shown to be substrates of PP2A-B55d [58], PP2A [59], and other phosphatases. We posit that the addition of cyclin B1 dm alone is not sufficient to accurately recapitulate the level of mitotic phosphorylation of one (or more) of these proteins and that proper phosphorylation is only achieved when the cyclin is added in combination with rArpp19.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Gwl Activity and Spindle Bipolaritymentioning
confidence: 99%