2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence theoretic protein fold classification based on the concept of hyperfold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, genetic algorithm is adopted to obtain weights for the outputs of the second layer to get the final result. Kavousi et al (2012) proposed the method upon which an unknown query protein is assigned to a hyperfold rather than a single fold. Each hyper_fold is a set of interlaced folds with a centroid fold and Dempster rule has been used to combine the results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, genetic algorithm is adopted to obtain weights for the outputs of the second layer to get the final result. Kavousi et al (2012) proposed the method upon which an unknown query protein is assigned to a hyperfold rather than a single fold. Each hyper_fold is a set of interlaced folds with a centroid fold and Dempster rule has been used to combine the results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features that capture significant global and local discriminatory information and the classification techniques that perform consistently with these extracted features have been used in the literature [2]. A wide range of classification techniques such as, artificial neural networks (ANN) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], meta classifiers [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], K-nearest neighbors [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and support vector machines (SVM) [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] have been used for the PFR. Among the classifiers employed to tackle the PFR, using support vector machine have attained the best results [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieved results have shown that the most significant enhancement for the protein fold prediction accuracy has been achieved by relying on the feature extraction approaches rather than the classification techniques being used [4], [15], [19], [27], [28], [29], [39]. In most of the studies that addressed the PFR by feature extraction techniques, global discriminatory information has been represented using the composition of the amino acids feature group (the percentage of the occurrence of the amino acids along the protein sequence divided by the length of protein sequence [19], [22], [30]). However, it has been shown that this feature group is not able to adequately reveal global information as it is not able to capture information regarding the length of the protein sequence [39], [40] which was shown as effective feature for the PFR [33], [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the last two decades, a wide range of classifiers such as, Bayesianbased learners [1], Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [2], Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [3], Meta classifiers [4,5], Support Vector Machine (SVM) [6][7][8] and ensemble methods [1,9,10] have been implemented and applied to this problem. Despite the crucial impact of the classification techniques used in solving this problem, the most important enhancements achieved were due to the attributes being selected and feature extraction methods being used [2,6,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%