2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence theoretic classification of ballistic missiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have been conducted using the following features: acceleration differences [6], aerodynamic properties [7], acceleration, height and specific energy [8], velocity, energy height and flight angle [9], position, velocity, RCS and acceleration [11], and dynamic RCS sequence [12]. However, several features have similar characteristics at a certain altitude or below during the reentry phase.…”
Section: A Narrowband Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have been conducted using the following features: acceleration differences [6], aerodynamic properties [7], acceleration, height and specific energy [8], velocity, energy height and flight angle [9], position, velocity, RCS and acceleration [11], and dynamic RCS sequence [12]. However, several features have similar characteristics at a certain altitude or below during the reentry phase.…”
Section: A Narrowband Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies focusing on warhead classification have been conducted in the last decade. Classification methods using feature matching [6], [7], the hidden Markov model [8], and the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (D-S theory) [9], [10] were studied to utilize the target kinematic parameters of the narrowband feature. The support vector machine (SVM) and neural network (NN) were used in [11], [12] to utilize the radar cross section (RCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose the state vector of missile target is x = (x(t), y(t), z(t), v x (t), v y (t), v z (t)) T in Earth centered fixed (ECF) coordinate system. In this case, the state-space model of a midcourse phase missile target has the following form [29 -32] 2 , μ is Earth's gravitational constant and μ = 3.986 006 4×10 5 km 3 /s 2 , J 2 is the second-order gravitational harmonic term of the Earth's gravitational field model and J 2 = −1.082 626 836 × 10 −3 , ω e is the Earth's angular velocity and ω e = 7.292 115 × 10 −5 rad/s, R e represents the Earth's equatorial radius and R e = 6 378.14 km, c e = 3J 2 R 2 e /2.…”
Section: Target Motion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it does not produce desired results when measuring uncertainty of basic probability assignment (BPA) in Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory that was put forward by Dempster [ 11 ] and then developed by Shafer [ 12 ]. The theory has proved to have significant advantages in representing, processing and fusing uncertain information or data by assigning a probability to the subsets of a set comprising multiple solutions rather than to each of the individual solution [ 13 , 14 ] and has been accepted as de facto standard in many fields [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], such as risk assessment [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], fault diagnosis [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], pattern classification [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], knowledge reasoning [ 28 , 29 ], and sensors’ network analysis [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%