2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002130000550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence that orexin-A-evoked grooming in the rat is mediated by orexin-1 (OX 1 ) receptors, with downstream 5-HT 2C receptor involvement

Abstract: This data suggests that orexin-A indirectly activates 5-HT2C receptors downstream from OX1 receptors to elicit grooming in the rat. The use of SB-334867-A in vivo will enable the role of OX,1 receptors within the rat central nervous system to be further characterised.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypocretins induce an intense grooming response accompanying the increase in arousal and locomotor activity (Hagan et al, 1999;Samson et al, 1999;Nakamura et al, 2000;Jones et al, 2001). These behavioral effects of hypocretins are blocked by an hcrt-r1 antagonist (Duxon et al, 2001). Interestingly, hypocretin-deficient mice display diminished behavioral response to emotional stress, suggesting that hypocretinproducing neurons play a role in one of the efferent pathways of defense response (Kayaba et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypocretins induce an intense grooming response accompanying the increase in arousal and locomotor activity (Hagan et al, 1999;Samson et al, 1999;Nakamura et al, 2000;Jones et al, 2001). These behavioral effects of hypocretins are blocked by an hcrt-r1 antagonist (Duxon et al, 2001). Interestingly, hypocretin-deficient mice display diminished behavioral response to emotional stress, suggesting that hypocretinproducing neurons play a role in one of the efferent pathways of defense response (Kayaba et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, DIO and DR rats differ in monoaminergic function (13,25,26), sensitivity to glucose (32), leptin (28,30), and/or insulin (5). However, since orexin A-induced effects are sensitive to metabolic status (3,34) and the circadian cycle (10,53), and are mediated downstream by monoamines (2,9,11,16,39), these differences could also be explained by variation in orexin signaling between DIO and DR rats. Dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra that innervate the striatum are a critical component of locomotor activity, and dopamine receptor antagonists block orexin A-induced locomotor activity when administered in the ventral tegmental area (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, to determine whether the enhanced W and motor performance seen with WT mice in the wheel test can be prevented by an antagonism of Ox neurotransmission, we performed, in both WT and Ox Ϫ/Ϫ mice and just before the test during the lights period, an intraperitoneal injection of SB-334867, a brain penetrating Ox-1 receptor antagonist (Duxon et al, 2001;Smart et al, 2001;Soffin et al, 2002). The antagonist at a dose of 30 mg/kg had no effects at all on W, locomotion and sleep stages in the KO mice, whereas, in contrast, the same injection did significantly decrease W and locomotion and increase SWS in WT littermates and, as a result, the amount of W, SWS or locomotion was brought close to that seen with KO mice during the wheel test alone.…”
Section: Wheel Test Coupled With Drug Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%